São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry and Research Institute, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora-Dentística, Faculdade de Odontologia e Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua José Rocha Junqueira, 13. Bairro Swift, Campinas, SP, CEP: 13045-755, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 May;20(4):857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1573-6. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the inhibition of demineralization around enamel-dentin/restoration interface after dentin pretreatment with 2.5% titanium tetrafluoride (TiF4).
Forty dental class V cavities at the cementoenamel junction were distributed into four groups (n = 10), according to the presence or absence of TiF4 and to the adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond/CL and Adper EasyOne/AD), and restored with a resin composite. A dynamic pH cycling model was used to induce the development of artificial caries lesions. After sectioning the dental blocks, Knoop microhardness tests were performed at different depths (20, 40, and 60 μm from the occlusal margin of the restoration) and at different distances (100, 200, and 300 μm from the adhesive interface). Repeated measures three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test were used (α = 0.05).
For enamel, there were no differences in the microhardness values for CL, AD, and TiF4-AD at depths, regardless of the distances. Considering each depth, there were no significant differences among treatments. For dentin, ANOVA showed no significant interaction among the independent variables treatmentdistancedepth (p = 0.994), no significant interaction between treatmentdepth (p = 0.722), no significant interaction between treatmentdistance (p = 0.265), no significant interaction between depth*distance (p = 0.365), and no significant effect on treatment (p = 0.151), depth (p = 0.067), or distance (p = 0.251).
Dentin pretreatment of the cavity walls with TiF4 before self-etching adhesive systems was not effective in inhibiting demineralization around the enamel-dentin/restoration interfaces.
The mechanism of incorporating fluoride in enamel and dentin of the cavity walls to inhibit demineralization around restorations seems ineffective when using TiF4 as a dentin pretreatment.
本研究旨在评估牙本质预处理 2.5%四氟化钛(TiF4)后牙釉质-牙本质/修复体界面脱矿的抑制情况。
根据是否使用 TiF4 以及使用何种粘接系统(Clearfil SE Bond/CL 和 Adper EasyOne/AD),将 40 个位于釉牙骨质界的 V 类洞分为四组(n = 10),并用树脂复合材料进行修复。采用动态 pH 循环模型诱导人工龋损的发展。将牙体标本切割后,在距修复体咬合缘 20、40 和 60 μm 以及距粘接界面 100、200 和 300 μm 处进行不同深度的克努普显微硬度测试。采用重复测量三因素方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 检验(α = 0.05)。
对于牙釉质,无论距离如何,CL、AD 和 TiF4-AD 在各深度的显微硬度值均无差异。考虑到每个深度,处理之间均无显著差异。对于牙本质,ANOVA 显示各独立变量(处理距离深度)之间无显著交互作用(p = 0.994),处理深度之间无显著交互作用(p = 0.722),处理距离之间无显著交互作用(p = 0.265),深度*距离之间无显著交互作用(p = 0.365),处理(p = 0.151)、深度(p = 0.067)或距离(p = 0.251)均无显著影响。
自酸蚀粘接系统应用于牙本质前,牙本质预处理用 TiF4 处理窝洞侧壁,对抑制牙釉质-牙本质/修复体界面周围的脱矿作用无效。
当使用 TiF4 作为牙本质预处理时,将氟化物掺入窝洞侧壁的牙釉质和牙本质中以抑制修复体周围脱矿的机制似乎无效。