Chung Charles S, Shmuylovich Leonid, Kovács Sándor J
Department of Physiology and Center for Muscle Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, and Department of Physiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; and.
Cardiovascular Biophysics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2015 Nov;309(9):H1392-406. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00436.2015. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
Despite Leonardo da Vinci's observation (circa 1511) that "the atria or filling chambers contract together while the pumping chambers or ventricles are relaxing and vice versa," the dynamics of four-chamber heart function, and of diastolic function (DF) in particular, are not generally appreciated. We view DF from a global perspective, while characterizing it in terms of causality and clinical relevance. Our models derive from the insight that global DF is ultimately a result of forces generated by elastic recoil, modulated by cross-bridge relaxation, and load. The interaction between recoil and relaxation results in physical wall motion that generates pressure gradients that drive fluid flow, while epicardial wall motion is constrained by the pericardial sac. Traditional DF indexes (τ, E/E', etc.) are not derived from causal mechanisms and are interpreted as approximating either stiffness or relaxation, but not both, thereby limiting the accuracy of DF quantification. Our derived kinematic models of isovolumic relaxation and suction-initiated filling are extensively validated, quantify the balance between stiffness and relaxation, and provide novel mechanistic physiological insight. For example, causality-based modeling provides load-independent indexes of DF and reveals that both stiffness and relaxation modify traditional DF indexes. The method has revealed that the in vivo left ventricular equilibrium volume occurs at diastasis, predicted novel relationships between filling and wall motion, and quantified causal relationships between ventricular and atrial function. In summary, by using governing physiological principles as a guide, we define what global DF is, what it is not, and how to measure it.
尽管列奥纳多·达·芬奇在大约1511年观察到“心房或充盈腔室同时收缩,而泵血腔室或心室则处于舒张状态,反之亦然”,但四腔心功能的动力学,尤其是舒张功能(DF),并未得到普遍认识。我们从整体角度看待DF,同时从因果关系和临床相关性方面对其进行描述。我们的模型源于这样一种见解,即整体DF最终是由弹性回缩产生的力的结果,该力由横桥舒张和负荷调节。回缩与舒张之间的相互作用导致物理性的壁运动,从而产生驱动流体流动的压力梯度,而心外膜壁运动则受到心包囊的限制。传统的DF指标(τ、E/E'等)并非源自因果机制,被解释为近似于僵硬度或舒张,但不能同时近似两者,从而限制了DF量化的准确性。我们推导的等容舒张和吸力引发充盈的运动学模型经过了广泛验证,量化了僵硬度与舒张之间的平衡,并提供了新颖的机制性生理见解。例如,基于因果关系的建模提供了与负荷无关的DF指标,并揭示僵硬度和舒张都会改变传统的DF指标。该方法揭示了体内左心室平衡容积出现在舒张期,预测了充盈与壁运动之间的新关系,并量化了心室与心房功能之间的因果关系。总之,以主导生理原理为指导,我们定义了什么是整体DF,不是什么,以及如何测量它。