Cardiovascular Biophysics Laboratory, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020 May 1;318(5):H1059-H1067. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00681.2019. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
The spatiotemporal features of normal in vivo cardiac motion are well established. Longitudinal velocity has become a focus of diastolic function (DF) characterization, particularly the tissue Doppler -wave, manifesting in early diastole when the left ventricle (LV) is a mechanical suction pump (dP/dV < 0). To characterize DF and elucidate mechanistic features, several models have been proposed and have been previously compared algebraically, numerically, and in their ability to fit physiological velocity data. We analyze two previously noncompared models of early rapid-filling lengthening velocity (Doppler -wave): parametrized diastolic filling (PDF) and force balance model (FBM). Our initial numerical experiments sampled FBM-generated () contours as input to determine PDF model predicted fit. The resulting exact numerical agreement [standard error of regression (SER) = 9.06 × 10] was not anticipated. Therefore, we analyzed all published FBM-generated () contours and observed identical agreement. We re-expressed FBM's algebraic expressions for () and observed for the first time that model-based predictions for lengthening velocity by the FBM and the PDF model are mathematically identical: () = γesinh(β), thereby providing exact algebraic relations between the three PDF parameters and the six FBM parameters. Previous pioneering experiments have independently established the unique determinants of e'() to be LV relaxation, restoring forces (stiffness), and load. In light of the exact intermodel agreement, we conclude that the three PDF parameters, relaxation, stiffness (restoring forces), and load, are unique determinants of DF and (). Thus, we show that only the PDF formalism can compute the three unique, independent, physiological determinants of long-axis LV myocardial velocity from (). We show that two separate, independently derived physiological (kinematic) models predict mathematically identical expressions for LV-lengthening velocity (Doppler -wave), indicating that damped harmonic oscillatory motion is a physiologically accurate model of diastolic function. Although both models predict the same "overdamped" velocity contour, only one model solves the "inverse problem" and generates unique, lumped parameters of relaxation, stiffness (restoring force), and load from the -wave.
正常体内心脏运动的时空特征已得到很好的确立。纵向速度已成为舒张功能 (DF) 特征描述的焦点,特别是组织多普勒波,在左心室 (LV) 作为机械抽吸泵时出现在早期舒张期 (dP/dV < 0)。为了描述 DF 并阐明机械特征,已经提出了几个模型,并且已经在代数、数值以及拟合生理速度数据的能力方面进行了比较。我们分析了两个以前未比较的早期快速充盈伸长速度 (多普勒波) 的模型:参数化舒张充盈 (PDF) 和力平衡模型 (FBM)。我们的初步数值实验以 FBM 生成的 () 轮廓作为输入来采样,以确定 PDF 模型的预测拟合。得到的精确数值一致性 [回归标准误差 (SER) = 9.06 × 10] 并未预料到。因此,我们分析了所有已发表的 FBM 生成的 () 轮廓,并观察到相同的一致性。我们重新表达了 FBM 的 () 代数表达式,并首次观察到 FBM 和 PDF 模型对伸长速度的模型预测在数学上是相同的:() = γesinh(β),从而为 PDF 模型的三个 PDF 参数和 FBM 的六个参数之间提供了精确的代数关系。以前的开创性实验已经独立地确定了 e'() 的唯一决定因素是 LV 松弛、恢复力 (刚度) 和负荷。鉴于精确的模型间一致性,我们得出结论,PDF 模型的三个参数,即松弛、刚度 (恢复力) 和负荷,是 DF 和 () 的唯一决定因素。因此,我们表明只有 PDF 形式主义才能从 () 计算出长轴 LV 心肌速度的三个独特的、独立的、生理的决定因素。我们表明,两个独立推导的生理 (运动学) 模型对 LV 伸长速度 (多普勒波) 预测出数学上相同的表达式,表明阻尼谐波振荡运动是舒张功能的生理准确模型。尽管两个模型都预测了相同的“过阻尼”速度轮廓,但只有一个模型从 -波解决了“逆问题”,并生成了松弛、刚度 (恢复力) 和负荷的唯一、集中参数。