Persoskie Alexander, Leyva Bryan
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):951-6. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0085.
In what is known as Simpson's Paradox, a statistical association present within different groups becomes reversed when the groups are aggregated. Because race is confounded with socioeconomic status (SES) in the U.S., the overall smoking rate among Blacks may exceed that among Whites, even while the reverse is true within SES strata (or when adjusting for SES). Indeed, in the most recent five iterations of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2008-2012), a nationwide dataset, unadjusted models found that non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to report current smoking (e.g., in 2012: OR=1.14, p<.0001). However, Blacks were less likely than Whites to report smoking across all five years when models adjusted for income (e.g., in 2012: OR=0.85, p<.0001) and in 2008-2010 when models adjusted for education. This reversal of association reflects racial disparities in SES, which cause Black Americans to be disproportionately affected by smoking risk factors associated with low income and education.
在所谓的辛普森悖论中,不同组内存在的统计关联在这些组合并时会发生逆转。由于在美国种族与社会经济地位(SES)相互混淆,黑人的总体吸烟率可能超过白人,即便在社会经济地位分层内情况相反(或在对社会经济地位进行调整时)。确实,在行为危险因素监测系统(2008 - 2012年)的最近五次迭代中(这是一个全国性数据集),未经调整的模型发现,非西班牙裔黑人比非西班牙裔白人更有可能报告当前吸烟情况(例如,2012年:优势比 = 1.14,p <.0001)。然而,当模型对收入进行调整时(例如,2012年:优势比 = 0.85,p <.0001),以及在2008 - 2010年模型对教育进行调整时,黑人在这五年中报告吸烟的可能性低于白人。这种关联的逆转反映了社会经济地位方面的种族差异,这使得美国黑人受到与低收入和低教育相关的吸烟危险因素的影响尤为严重。