Suppr超能文献

2008年至2012年美国吸烟率中的辛普森悖论:黑人吸烟比白人少(也比白人多)

Blacks Smoke Less (and More) than Whites: Simpson's Paradox in U.S. Smoking Rates, 2008 to 2012.

作者信息

Persoskie Alexander, Leyva Bryan

出版信息

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):951-6. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0085.

Abstract

In what is known as Simpson's Paradox, a statistical association present within different groups becomes reversed when the groups are aggregated. Because race is confounded with socioeconomic status (SES) in the U.S., the overall smoking rate among Blacks may exceed that among Whites, even while the reverse is true within SES strata (or when adjusting for SES). Indeed, in the most recent five iterations of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2008-2012), a nationwide dataset, unadjusted models found that non-Hispanic Blacks were more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to report current smoking (e.g., in 2012: OR=1.14, p<.0001). However, Blacks were less likely than Whites to report smoking across all five years when models adjusted for income (e.g., in 2012: OR=0.85, p<.0001) and in 2008-2010 when models adjusted for education. This reversal of association reflects racial disparities in SES, which cause Black Americans to be disproportionately affected by smoking risk factors associated with low income and education.

摘要

在所谓的辛普森悖论中,不同组内存在的统计关联在这些组合并时会发生逆转。由于在美国种族与社会经济地位(SES)相互混淆,黑人的总体吸烟率可能超过白人,即便在社会经济地位分层内情况相反(或在对社会经济地位进行调整时)。确实,在行为危险因素监测系统(2008 - 2012年)的最近五次迭代中(这是一个全国性数据集),未经调整的模型发现,非西班牙裔黑人比非西班牙裔白人更有可能报告当前吸烟情况(例如,2012年:优势比 = 1.14,p <.0001)。然而,当模型对收入进行调整时(例如,2012年:优势比 = 0.85,p <.0001),以及在2008 - 2010年模型对教育进行调整时,黑人在这五年中报告吸烟的可能性低于白人。这种关联的逆转反映了社会经济地位方面的种族差异,这使得美国黑人受到与低收入和低教育相关的吸烟危险因素的影响尤为严重。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验