Chhangani N P, Amandeep Minhas, Choudhary Sandeep, Gupta Vidit, Goyal Vishnu
Department of Paediatrics, Umaid Hospital, Dr. S N Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;19(8):462-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.162463.
This study was conducted to validate the use of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system in pediatric population in predicting the risk of mortality and to compare the predicted death rate (using APACHE II) with the actual death rate of the patients.
Hospital-based prospective study.
Tertiary care Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in Western Rajasthan, India.
A total of 100 critically ill children between 1 and 18 years of age admitted to PICU and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled. APACHE II score was calculated in each patient on the day of admission. The predicted mortality was calculated on the basis of this score.
The mean APACHE II score was 21.35 ± 5.76. Mean APACHE II score among the survivors was 16.60 ± 6.12, and mean APACHE II score among the nonsurvivors was 26.11 ± 5.41, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.00). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for APACHE II score was found to be 0.889 (P = 0.008) indicating good discrimination.
APACHE II scoring system has a good discrimination and calibration when applied to a pediatric population.
本研究旨在验证急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)评分系统在儿科人群中预测死亡风险的应用,并比较(使用APACHE II)预测死亡率与患者实际死亡率。
基于医院的前瞻性研究。
印度拉贾斯坦邦西部的三级护理儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。
共纳入100名入住PICU且符合纳入标准的1至18岁危重症儿童。每位患者在入院当天计算APACHE II评分。基于该评分计算预测死亡率。
APACHE II评分的平均值为21.35±5.76。幸存者的APACHE II评分平均值为16.60±6.12,非幸存者的APACHE II评分平均值为26.11±5.41,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.00)。APACHE II评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为(P = 0.008),表明具有良好的区分度。
APACHE II评分系统应用于儿科人群时具有良好的区分度和校准性。