Suppr超能文献

急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II评分系统在判定儿科重症监护病房危重症患儿病情严重程度及预后中的作用

Role of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II scoring system in determining the severity and prognosis of critically ill patients in pediatric intensive care unit.

作者信息

Chhangani N P, Amandeep Minhas, Choudhary Sandeep, Gupta Vidit, Goyal Vishnu

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Umaid Hospital, Dr. S N Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;19(8):462-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.162463.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to validate the use of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring system in pediatric population in predicting the risk of mortality and to compare the predicted death rate (using APACHE II) with the actual death rate of the patients.

DESIGN

Hospital-based prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary care Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in Western Rajasthan, India.

METHODS

A total of 100 critically ill children between 1 and 18 years of age admitted to PICU and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled. APACHE II score was calculated in each patient on the day of admission. The predicted mortality was calculated on the basis of this score.

RESULTS

The mean APACHE II score was 21.35 ± 5.76. Mean APACHE II score among the survivors was 16.60 ± 6.12, and mean APACHE II score among the nonsurvivors was 26.11 ± 5.41, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.00). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for APACHE II score was found to be 0.889 (P = 0.008) indicating good discrimination.

CONCLUSION

APACHE II scoring system has a good discrimination and calibration when applied to a pediatric population.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)评分系统在儿科人群中预测死亡风险的应用,并比较(使用APACHE II)预测死亡率与患者实际死亡率。

设计

基于医院的前瞻性研究。

地点

印度拉贾斯坦邦西部的三级护理儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。

方法

共纳入100名入住PICU且符合纳入标准的1至18岁危重症儿童。每位患者在入院当天计算APACHE II评分。基于该评分计算预测死亡率。

结果

APACHE II评分的平均值为21.35±5.76。幸存者的APACHE II评分平均值为16.60±6.12,非幸存者的APACHE II评分平均值为26.11±5.41,差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.00)。APACHE II评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为(P = 0.008),表明具有良好的区分度。

结论

APACHE II评分系统应用于儿科人群时具有良好的区分度和校准性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff39/4548415/78e7765332f5/IJCCM-19-462-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验