Petrillo Francesca De, Micucci Antonia, Gori Emanuele, Truppa Valentina, Ariely Dan, Addessi Elsa
Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Rome, Italy ; Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Sapienza Università di Roma Rome, Italy.
Unità di Primatologia Cognitiva e Centro Primati, Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Rome, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 11;6:1193. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01193. eCollection 2015.
Self-control failure has enormous personal and societal consequences. One of the most debated models explaining why self-control breaks down is the Strength Model, according to which self-control depends on a limited resource. Either previous acts of self-control or taking part in highly demanding cognitive tasks have been shown to reduce self-control, possibly due to a reduction in blood glucose levels. However, several studies yielded negative findings, and recent meta-analyses questioned the robustness of the depletion effect in humans. We investigated, for the first time, whether the Strength Model applies to a non-human primate species, the tufted capuchin monkey. We tested five capuchins in a self-control task (the Accumulation task) in which food items were accumulated within individual's reach for as long as the subject refrained from taking them. We evaluated whether capuchins' performance decreases: (i) when tested before receiving their daily meal rather than after consuming it (Energy Depletion Experiment), and (ii) after being tested in two tasks with different levels of cognitive complexity (Cognitive Depletion Experiment). We also tested, in both experiments, how implementing self-control in each trial of the Accumulation task affected this capacity within each session and/or across consecutive sessions. Repeated acts of self-control in each trial of the Accumulation task progressively reduced this capacity within each session, as predicted by the Strength Model. However, neither experiencing a reduction in energy level nor taking part in a highly demanding cognitive task decreased performance in the subsequent Accumulation task. Thus, whereas capuchins seem to be vulnerable to within-session depletion effects, to other extents our findings are in line with the growing body of studies that failed to find a depletion effect in humans. Methodological issues potentially affecting the lack of depletion effects in capuchins are discussed.
自我控制失败会带来巨大的个人和社会后果。解释自我控制为何会瓦解的最具争议的模型之一是力量模型,根据该模型,自我控制依赖于一种有限的资源。先前的自我控制行为或参与高要求的认知任务都已被证明会降低自我控制能力,这可能是由于血糖水平降低所致。然而,多项研究得出了否定的结果,最近的荟萃分析也对人类中耗竭效应的稳健性提出了质疑。我们首次研究了力量模型是否适用于一种非人类灵长类动物——卷尾猴。我们在一项自我控制任务(积累任务)中测试了五只卷尾猴,在该任务中,只要受试者不拿走食物,食物就会在其可及范围内积累起来。我们评估了卷尾猴的表现是否会下降:(i)在接受每日食物之前而非之后进行测试时(能量耗竭实验),以及(ii)在两项具有不同认知复杂度的任务中进行测试之后(认知耗竭实验)。我们还在这两项实验中测试了在积累任务的每次试验中实施自我控制是如何在每个会话内和/或跨连续会话影响这种能力的。正如力量模型所预测的那样,在积累任务的每次试验中重复进行自我控制行为会在每个会话内逐渐降低这种能力。然而,无论是经历能量水平下降还是参与高要求的认知任务,都不会降低随后积累任务中的表现。因此,虽然卷尾猴似乎容易受到会话内耗竭效应的影响,但在其他方面,我们的研究结果与越来越多未能在人类中发现耗竭效应的研究一致。我们讨论了可能影响卷尾猴缺乏耗竭效应的方法学问题。