Staley Christopher, Gould Trevor J, Wang Ping, Phillips Jane, Cotner James B, Sadowsky Michael J
BioTechnology Institute, University of Minnesota, 140 Gortner Lab, 1479 Gortner Ave, St Paul, MN 55108, USA E-mail:
Biology Program, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN, USA.
J Water Health. 2015 Sep;13(3):693-703. doi: 10.2166/wh.2014.215.
In this study, we determined the frequency of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the Upper Mississippi River using a high-throughput, functional, metagenomic screening procedure. Fosmid libraries containing ∼10,000 clones were screened for resistance to ampicillin, cephalothin, kanamycin, and tetracycline. We hypothesized that nutrient concentrations, land cover type, and taxonomic community composition may select for ARGs. Resistance to ampicillin, cephalothin, and kanamycin was low (<1.00%), and no resistance to tetracycline was detected. Ammonium and total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations were correlated with kanamycin and cephalothin resistances (r=0.617 and -0.449, P=0.002 and 0.036, respectively). Cephalothin resistance was also positively correlated with the percentage of forested land cover (r=0.444, P=0.039). Only the candidate division OD1, among 35 phyla identified, was correlated with ampicillin resistance (r=0.456, P=0.033), suggesting that minority members of the community may be responsible for dissemination of ARGs in this ecosystem. Results of this study suggest that ammonium and TDS may be involved in a complex selection process for ARGs. Furthermore, we suggest that minority species, potentially contributed in low numbers from sediment and biofilm reservoirs, may be the primary carriers of ARGs in this riverine system.
在本研究中,我们采用高通量、功能性宏基因组筛选程序,测定了密西西比河上游抗生素抗性基因(ARGs)的频率。对含有约10,000个克隆的fosmid文库进行了氨苄青霉素、头孢菌素、卡那霉素和四环素抗性筛选。我们假设营养物浓度、土地覆盖类型和分类群落组成可能会选择ARGs。对氨苄青霉素、头孢菌素和卡那霉素的抗性较低(<1.00%),未检测到对四环素的抗性。铵和总溶解固体(TDS)浓度与卡那霉素和头孢菌素抗性相关(r分别为0.617和-0.449,P分别为0.002和0.036)。头孢菌素抗性也与林地覆盖百分比呈正相关(r=0.444,P=0.039)。在鉴定出的35个门中,只有候选分类群OD1与氨苄青霉素抗性相关(r=0.456,P=0.033),这表明群落中的少数成员可能是该生态系统中ARGs传播的原因。本研究结果表明,铵和TDS可能参与了ARGs的复杂选择过程。此外,我们认为少数物种可能是该河流系统中ARGs的主要载体,这些物种可能少量来自沉积物和生物膜库。