Suppr超能文献

从体弱老年人角度对蒂尔堡衰弱指标进行内容效度验证:一项定性探索性研究。

Content validation of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator from the perspective of frail elderly. A qualitative explorative study.

作者信息

Andreasen Jane, Lund Hans, Aadahl Mette, Gobbens Robbert J J, Sorensen Erik E

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Sdr. Skovvej 15, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark.

Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, Institute for Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark; Centre for Knowledge Based Practice, Bergen University College, Inndalsveien 28, Postbox 7030, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Nov-Dec;61(3):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The Tilburg Frailty Indicator is a questionnaire with a bio-psycho-social approach, which measures frailty by 15 questions. A questionnaire about frailty should be in alignment with experiences of frail elderly themselves as a target population is an important source of knowledge in content validation.

AIM

To validate the Tilburg Frailty Indicator on content in relation to the physical, psychological and social domain by exploring the experience of daily life of community dwelling frail elderly.

METHODS

The design was a qualitative content validation study. The participants were acutely admitted frail elderly discharged to home and interviewed one week after discharge. A deductive content analysis, with categories structured in advance, was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 422 meaning units were extracted from the transcriptions; 131 units related to the physical domain, 106 units to the psychological domain and 185 units to the social domain. 56 units were not linked into the existing structure of the questionnaire. 14 of 15 questions were confirmed from a target population perspective. The four issues pain, sleep quality, spirituality and meaningful activities that seem to be important elements for frail elderly were not directly covered by the questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

It seems likely that the majority of important items related to frailty are covered in the questionnaire. The findings add to the scientific body of knowledge in relation to the validity of the questionnaire. Future research should investigate the importance of the four issues pain, sleep quality, spirituality and meaningful activities in relation to the screening of frailty.

摘要

未标注

蒂尔堡衰弱指标是一份采用生物 - 心理 - 社会方法的问卷,通过15个问题来衡量衰弱程度。一份关于衰弱的问卷应与衰弱老年人自身的经历相符,因为目标人群是内容效度验证中知识的重要来源。

目的

通过探索社区居住的衰弱老年人的日常生活经历,对蒂尔堡衰弱指标在身体、心理和社会领域的内容效度进行验证。

方法

设计为定性内容效度研究。参与者为急性入院后出院回家的衰弱老年人,出院一周后进行访谈。采用预先构建类别的演绎性内容分析。

结果

从转录内容中总共提取了422个意义单元;131个单元与身体领域相关,106个单元与心理领域相关,185个单元与社会领域相关。56个单元未纳入问卷的现有结构。从目标人群的角度确认了15个问题中的14个。问卷未直接涵盖疼痛、睡眠质量、精神性和有意义活动这四个对衰弱老年人似乎很重要的问题。

讨论

问卷似乎涵盖了与衰弱相关的大多数重要项目。这些发现增加了与问卷效度相关的科学知识体系。未来的研究应调查疼痛、睡眠质量、精神性和有意义活动这四个问题在衰弱筛查中的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验