Hoffman Stephen L, Vekemans Johan, Richie Thomas L, Duffy Patrick E
Sanaria Inc., Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
GSK Vaccines, Rixensart, Belgium.
Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):D13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.091. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
In 2013 there were an estimated 584,000 deaths and 198 million clinical illnesses due to malaria, the majority in sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccines would be the ideal addition to the existing armamentarium of anti-malaria tools. However, malaria is caused by parasites, and parasites are much more complex in terms of their biology than the viruses and bacteria for which we have vaccines, passing through multiple stages of development in the human host, each stage expressing hundreds of unique antigens. This complexity makes it more difficult to develop a vaccine for parasites than for viruses and bacteria, since an immune response targeting one stage may not offer protection against a later stage, because different antigens are the targets of protective immunity at different stages. Furthermore, depending on the life cycle stage and whether the parasite is extra- or intra-cellular, antibody and/or cellular immune responses provide protection. It is thus not surprising that there is no vaccine on the market for prevention of malaria, or any human parasitic infection. In fact, no vaccine for any disease with this breadth of targets and immune responses exists. In this limited review, we focus on four approaches to malaria vaccines, (1) a recombinant protein with adjuvant vaccine aimed at Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) pre-erythrocytic stages of the parasite cycle (RTS,S/AS01), (2) whole sporozoite vaccines aimed at Pf pre-erythrocytic stages (PfSPZ Vaccine and PfSPZ-CVac), (3) prime boost vaccines that include recombinant DNA, viruses and bacteria, and protein with adjuvant aimed primarily at Pf pre-erythrocytic, but also asexual erythrocytic stages, and (4) recombinant protein with adjuvant vaccines aimed at Pf and Plasmodium vivax sexual erythrocytic and mosquito stages. We recognize that we are not covering all approaches to malaria vaccine development, or most of the critically important work on development of vaccines against P. vivax, the second most important cause of malaria. Progress during the last few years has been significant, and a first generation malaria candidate vaccine, RTS,S/AS01, is under review by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for its quality, safety and efficacy under article 58, which allows the EMA to give a scientific opinion about products intended exclusively for markets outside of the European Union. However, much work is in progress to optimize malaria vaccines in regard to magnitude and durability of protective efficacy and the financing and practicality of delivery. Thus, we are hopeful that anti-malaria vaccines will soon be important tools in the battle against malaria.
2013年,据估计因疟疾死亡的人数达58.4万,出现临床症状的病例达1.98亿,其中大部分发生在撒哈拉以南非洲地区。疫苗将是现有抗疟疾工具理想的补充。然而,疟疾是由寄生虫引起的,寄生虫的生物学特性比我们已有疫苗针对的病毒和细菌要复杂得多,它在人类宿主体内经历多个发育阶段,每个阶段都表达数百种独特的抗原。这种复杂性使得开发针对寄生虫的疫苗比开发针对病毒和细菌的疫苗更加困难,因为针对一个阶段的免疫反应可能无法为后续阶段提供保护,不同阶段保护性免疫的靶点是不同的抗原。此外,根据生命周期阶段以及寄生虫是细胞外还是细胞内的,抗体和/或细胞免疫反应提供保护。因此,市场上没有用于预防疟疾或任何人类寄生虫感染的疫苗也就不足为奇了。事实上,针对具有如此广泛靶点和免疫反应的任何疾病都不存在疫苗。在这篇有限的综述中,我们重点关注疟疾疫苗的四种研发途径:(1)一种带有佐剂的重组蛋白疫苗,针对恶性疟原虫(Pf)寄生虫周期的红细胞前期阶段(RTS,S/AS01);(2)针对Pf红细胞前期阶段的全子孢子疫苗(PfSPZ疫苗和PfSPZ-CVac);(3)初免-加强疫苗,包括重组DNA、病毒、细菌以及带有佐剂的蛋白,主要针对Pf红细胞前期阶段,但也针对无性红细胞阶段;(4)带有佐剂的重组蛋白疫苗,针对Pf和间日疟原虫的有性红细胞期及蚊虫阶段。我们认识到我们并未涵盖疟疾疫苗研发的所有途径,也未涵盖针对间日疟原虫(疟疾的第二大重要病因)疫苗研发的大部分关键工作。过去几年取得了显著进展,第一代疟疾候选疫苗RTS,S/AS01正在接受欧洲药品管理局(EMA)根据第58条对其质量、安全性和有效性的审查,该条款允许EMA对专门面向欧盟以外市场的产品给出科学意见。然而,在优化疟疾疫苗的保护效力强度和持久性以及疫苗交付的资金和实用性方面,仍有许多工作正在进行。因此,我们希望抗疟疾疫苗很快将成为抗击疟疾斗争中的重要工具。