Ren Xiaolin, Salazar Robert, Neargarder Sandy, Roy Serge, Ellis Terry D, Saltzman Elliot, Cronin-Golomb Alice
Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, USA.
Vision Res. 2015 Oct;115(Pt A):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
Veering while walking is often reported in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD), with potential mechanisms being vision-based (asymmetrical perception of the visual environment) or motoric (asymmetry in stride length between relatively affected and non-affected body side). We examined these competing hypotheses by assessing veering in 13 normal control participants (NC) and 20 non-demented individuals with PD: 9 with left-side onset of motor symptoms (LPD) and 11 with right-side onset (RPD). Participants walked in a corridor under three conditions: eyes-open, egocentric reference point (ECRP; walk toward a subjectively perceived center of a target at the end of the corridor), and vision-occluded. The visual hypothesis predicted that LPD participants would veer rightward, in line with their rightward visual-field bias, whereas those with RPD would veer leftward. The motor hypothesis predicted the opposite pattern of results, with veering toward the side with shorter stride length. Results supported the visual hypothesis. Under visual guidance, RPD participants significantly differed from NC, veering leftward despite a shorter right- than left-stride length, whereas LPD veered rightward (not significantly different from NC), despite shorter left- than right-stride length. LPD participants showed significantly reduced rightward veering and stride asymmetry when they walked in the presence of a visual landmark (ECRP) than in the eyes-open condition without a target. There were no group differences in veering in the vision-occluded condition. The findings suggest that interventions to correct walking abnormalities such as veering in PD should incorporate vision-based strategies rather than solely addressing motor asymmetries, and should be tailored to the distinctive navigational profiles of LPD and RPD.
帕金森病(PD)患者常常被报告在行走时出现偏向,其潜在机制可能基于视觉(对视觉环境的不对称感知)或运动(相对受影响和未受影响身体侧的步幅不对称)。我们通过评估13名正常对照参与者(NC)和20名非痴呆PD患者的偏向情况来检验这些相互竞争的假设:9名运动症状左侧起病的患者(LPD)和11名右侧起病的患者(RPD)。参与者在走廊中在三种条件下行走:睁眼、以自我为中心的参考点(ECRP;朝着走廊尽头主观感知的目标中心行走)和视觉遮挡。视觉假设预测LPD参与者会向右偏,这与他们的右视野偏向一致,而RPD参与者会向左偏。运动假设预测结果会相反,即偏向步幅较短的一侧。结果支持了视觉假设。在视觉引导下,RPD参与者与NC有显著差异,尽管右步幅比左步幅短,但仍向左偏,而LPD尽管左步幅比右步幅短,但仍向右偏(与NC无显著差异)。与没有目标的睁眼条件相比,LPD参与者在有视觉地标(ECRP)的情况下行走时,向右的偏向和步幅不对称显著减少。在视觉遮挡条件下,各小组之间的偏向没有差异。研究结果表明,纠正PD患者行走异常(如偏向)的干预措施应纳入基于视觉的策略,而不是仅解决运动不对称问题,并且应根据LPD和RPD独特的导航特征进行调整。