• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的自愿和非自愿精神科住院治疗

Voluntary and Involuntary Psychiatric Admissions in China.

作者信息

Zhou Jian-Song, Xiang Yu-Tao, Zhu Xiao-Min, Liang Weiye, Li Haien, Yi Jialong, Liu Fei, Zhao Na, Chen Gang, Shi Shulin, Li Guoping, Shen Danlin, Wei Ning, Qi Fang, Tan Wei, Ungvari Gabor S, Ng Chee H, Hao Wei, Li Lingjiang, Wang Xiaoping

机构信息

Dr. Zhou, Dr. Zhu, Dr. Hao, Dr. Lingjiang Li, and Dr. Wang are with Hunan Province Technology Institute of Psychiatry and Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health of Hunan Province, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (e-mail:

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1341-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400566. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201400566
PMID:26325460
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examined admission patterns, including voluntary, involuntary, and partly voluntary admissions to Chinese psychiatric hospitals, in relation to sociodemographic and clinical factors, before a new mental health law was implemented in 2013.

METHODS

Previously admitted patients were interviewed within one week after discharge from 16 psychiatric hospitals across China. Patients' basic sociodemographic and clinical data, including results from the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) and the Insight and Treatment Attitudes Questionnaire (ITAQ), were collected.

RESULTS

Among 797 patients, 224 (28%) had voluntary admissions, 336 (42%) had involuntary admissions, and 237 (30%) had partly voluntary admissions. Male gender, history of hospitalization, diagnosis of schizophrenia and related disorders, and high MOAS score were the risk factors for involuntary admissions, whereas more years of education, higher ITAQ score, and outpatient treatment before the index admission were its protective factors. A diagnosis of schizophrenia-related disorder and high MOAS score were the risk factors for partly voluntary admission, whereas more education and high ITAQ score were its protective factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Perception of dangerousness and poor insight about mental illness were significant factors in involuntary psychiatric admissions in China. Factors contributing to the changes in patterns of psychiatric admissions after China's implementation of the mental health law are important topics for further research.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了2013年新的精神卫生法实施之前,中国精神病医院的入院模式,包括自愿、非自愿和部分自愿入院情况,并分析其与社会人口统计学和临床因素的关系。

方法

对中国16家精神病医院此前收治的患者在出院后一周内进行访谈。收集患者的基本社会人口统计学和临床数据,包括修订版外显攻击行为量表(MOAS)和自知力与治疗态度问卷(ITAQ)的结果。

结果

797例患者中,224例(28%)为自愿入院,336例(42%)为非自愿入院,237例(30%)为部分自愿入院。男性、住院史、精神分裂症及相关障碍诊断、MOAS高分是非自愿入院的危险因素,而受教育年限更长、ITAQ得分更高、本次入院前接受门诊治疗是非自愿入院的保护因素。精神分裂症相关障碍诊断和MOAS高分是部分自愿入院的危险因素,而受教育程度更高和ITAQ得分高是其保护因素。

结论

对危险性的认知和对精神疾病的自知力差是中国非自愿精神科入院的重要因素。中国实施精神卫生法后精神科入院模式变化的影响因素是进一步研究的重要课题。

相似文献

1
Voluntary and Involuntary Psychiatric Admissions in China.中国的自愿和非自愿精神科住院治疗
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1341-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400566. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
2
Voluntary and Involuntary Admissions for Severe Mental Illness in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.自愿和非自愿住院治疗严重精神疾病在中国:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Jan 1;71(1):83-86. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900106. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
3
Involuntary first admission of patients with schizophrenia as a predictor of future admissions.精神分裂症患者的首次非自愿入院作为未来入院的预测指标。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Aug;50(8):1049-52. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.8.1049.
4
Does Involuntary Admission With Bipolar Disorder Differ From Involuntary Admission With Schizophrenia and Related Disorders? A Report From the Dublin Involuntary Admission Study (DIAS).双相情感障碍的非自愿入院与精神分裂症及相关障碍的非自愿入院有何不同?都柏林非自愿入院研究(DIAS)报告。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2018 May;24(3):209-216. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000300.
5
Involuntary psychiatric holds - the structure of admissions on the example of Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw.非自愿精神科住院治疗——以华沙精神病学与神经病学研究所为例的收治结构
Psychiatr Pol. 2016;50(1):7-18. doi: 10.12740/PP/33336.
6
Evaluating the clinical impact of involuntary admission to a specialized dual diagnosis ward.评估非自愿入住专科双重诊断病房的临床影响。
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2014;51(4):290-5.
7
Voluntary admissions for patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.精神分裂症患者的自愿入院治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Feb;48:101902. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.101902. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Frequency of involuntary admissions and its associations with demographic and clinical characteristics in China.中国非自愿住院的频率及其与人口统计学和临床特征的关联。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014 Aug;28(4):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
9
Retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics, involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act 1983, and number of psychiatric beds in England 1996-2006.1996 - 2006年英格兰医院病历统计数据、依据1983年《精神健康法》的非自愿住院情况及精神病床位数量的回顾性分析。
BMJ. 2008 Oct 9;337:a1837. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1837.
10
Impact of social-psychiatric services and psychiatric clinics on involuntary admissions.社会精神科服务和精神科诊所对非自愿入院的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;60(7):672-80. doi: 10.1177/0020764013511794. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Altered cortical thickness associated with psychotic symptoms and cognitive profiles in involuntarily hospitalized, first-episode, drug-naive patients with schizophrenia.首次发作、未用药的精神分裂症患者非自愿住院时,皮质厚度改变与精神病性症状及认知特征相关。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 24;16:1596991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1596991. eCollection 2025.
2
Involuntary Hospitalizations in an Italian Acute Psychiatric Ward: A 6-Year Retrospective Analysis.意大利一家急性精神科病房的非自愿住院治疗:一项为期6年的回顾性分析。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Dec 14;17:3403-3420. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S437116. eCollection 2023.
3
A comparison of patient-reported quality between inpatient services for mental and physical health: A tertiary-hospital-based survey in China.
精神与身体健康住院服务中患者报告的质量比较:一项基于中国三级医院的调查
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 9;14:1090892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1090892. eCollection 2023.
4
Why did China's mental health law have a limited effect on decreasing rates of involuntary hospitalization?为什么中国的《精神卫生法》在降低非自愿住院率方面效果有限?
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Jul 2;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00543-w.
5
Patients' and family members' experiences of psychiatric inpatient services in China: a comparison based on a dyadic design.患者及其家属对中国精神科住院服务的体验:基于对偶设计的比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2119-2129. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02296-w. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
The integration of mental health care act in primary care: an audit of the use of mental health care act forms for patients´ admission and the effect of continuing medical education on health professionals´ performance of usage, based on Letsholathebe II Memorial Hospital´s experience, in Maun, Botswana.将精神卫生保健法案融入初级保健:以博茨瓦纳马翁的 Letsholathebe II 纪念医院的经验为例,对精神卫生保健法案表格在患者入院时的使用情况进行审核,以及继续医学教育对卫生专业人员使用情况的影响。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Sep 20;40:49. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.49.26114. eCollection 2021.
7
Factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in Portugal.葡萄牙非自愿精神科住院治疗的相关因素。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Apr 20;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00460-4.
8
Treatment Capacity and Clinical Outcomes for Patients With Schizophrenia Who Were Treated With Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.电抽搐治疗精神分裂症患者的治疗能力和临床结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Mar 16;47(2):424-432. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa144.
9
Retrospective Chart Review of Voluntary Admissions to an Inpatient Psychiatric Hospital in New York City: A Demographic Breakdown.纽约市一家住院精神病医院自愿入院病例的回顾性病历审查:人口统计学细分
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Apr;56(3):448-455. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00498-2. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
10
Changing patterns and influencing factors of involuntary admissions following the implementation of China's mental health law: A 4-year longitudinal investigation.中国精神卫生法实施后非自愿住院模式的变化及影响因素:一项 4 年的纵向研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 24;9(1):15252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51980-6.