• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国精神卫生法实施后非自愿住院模式的变化及影响因素:一项 4 年的纵向研究。

Changing patterns and influencing factors of involuntary admissions following the implementation of China's mental health law: A 4-year longitudinal investigation.

机构信息

Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, P.R. China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 24;9(1):15252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51980-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-51980-6
PMID:31649331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6813341/
Abstract

Involuntary admission (IA) is limited to particular situations in mental health laws to protect patients from unnecessary coercion. China's first national mental health law has been in effect since 2013; however, the status of IA has not been sufficiently explored. To explore the changing patterns of IA since the clinical application of the IA criteria specified in the new law, an investigation of IA status was undertaken in 14 periods (each period lasting for one month from 05/2013 to 05/2017) in the tertiary specialized psychiatric hospital in Shanghai. The socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of 3733 patients were collected. The differences among IA rates in different periods were compared, and the characteristics of patients who were and were not involuntarily admitted were analysed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to clarify the independent variables of IA. The IA rate dramatically decreased after the implementation of the new law, while the overall trend gradually increased. The implementation of the IA risk criteria is effective, but IA is still common in China. The medical factors influencing IA following the implementation of the new law are similar to those in previous studies at home and abroad. Non-medical factors might be the main causes of the high IA rates in Chinese psychiatric institutions.

摘要

非自愿住院(IA)在精神卫生法中仅限于特定情况,以保护患者免受不必要的强制。中国第一部国家心理健康法自 2013 年起生效;然而,IA 的状况尚未得到充分探讨。为了探索自新法律规定的 IA 标准临床应用以来 IA 的变化模式,对上海一家三级专业精神病院的 14 个时期(每个时期从 2013 年 5 月至 2017 年 5 月持续一个月)的 IA 状况进行了调查。收集了 3733 名患者的社会人口统计学和临床特征。比较了不同时期 IA 率的差异,并分析了被强制住院和未被强制住院患者的特征。多因素逻辑回归分析用于明确 IA 的独立变量。新法律实施后,IA 率大幅下降,而总体趋势逐渐上升。IA 风险标准的实施是有效的,但 IA 在我国仍然很常见。新法律实施后影响 IA 的医学因素与国内外以往研究相似。非医学因素可能是中国精神病院 IA 率高的主要原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5085/6813341/62e17434f011/41598_2019_51980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5085/6813341/62e17434f011/41598_2019_51980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5085/6813341/62e17434f011/41598_2019_51980_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Changing patterns and influencing factors of involuntary admissions following the implementation of China's mental health law: A 4-year longitudinal investigation.中国精神卫生法实施后非自愿住院模式的变化及影响因素:一项 4 年的纵向研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 24;9(1):15252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51980-6.
2
Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics associated with involuntary admissions in Switzerland between 2008 and 2016: An observational cohort study before and after implementation of the new legislation.2008 年至 2016 年期间瑞士非自愿住院的临床和社会人口统计学特征:新立法实施前后的观察性队列研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;59:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 May 10.
3
Involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation - differences and similarities between patients detained under the mental health act and according to the legal guardianship legislation.非自愿住院治疗——依据《精神健康法》被拘留的患者与依据法定监护立法被拘留的患者之间的异同。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05892-z.
4
[Characteristics of patients who received an indication of involuntary admission, with or without the involvement of a third party, in a Parisian psychiatric emergency unit].[在巴黎一家精神科急诊室接受非自愿住院指征的患者特征,无论是否有第三方介入]
Encephale. 2019 Nov;45(5):405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
Voluntary versus involuntary hospital admission in child and adolescent psychiatry: a German sample.自愿与非自愿住院治疗在儿童和青少年精神病学中的比较:德国样本。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;23(3):151-61. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0440-8. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
6
Factors associated with involuntary hospitalisation for psychiatric patients in Switzerland: a retrospective study.瑞士与精神科患者非自愿住院相关的因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1966-6.
7
Frequency of involuntary admissions and its associations with demographic and clinical characteristics in China.中国非自愿住院的频率及其与人口统计学和临床特征的关联。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2014 Aug;28(4):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
8
Voluntary and Involuntary Psychiatric Admissions in China.中国的自愿和非自愿精神科住院治疗
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1341-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400566. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
Involuntary admission for psychiatric treatment: Compliance with the law and legal considerations in referring physicians with different professional backgrounds.非自愿住院精神治疗:不同专业背景转介医生的法律遵从和法律考量。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
10
Socio-economic impact on involuntary admissions and coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany.德国精神病院非自愿入院和强制性措施的社会经济影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jul-Aug;71:101597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101597. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Status and clinical influencing factors of involuntary admission in chinese patients with schizophrenia.中国精神分裂症患者非自愿住院的现状及临床影响因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 21;22(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04480-3.
2
Why did China's mental health law have a limited effect on decreasing rates of involuntary hospitalization?为什么中国的《精神卫生法》在降低非自愿住院率方面效果有限?
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Jul 2;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00543-w.
3
Factors associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in Portugal.

本文引用的文献

1
The Implementation of China's Mental Health Law-Defined Risk Criteria for Involuntary Admission: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Involuntarily Hospitalized Patients.中国《精神卫生法》规定的非自愿住院风险标准的实施:对非自愿住院患者的全国性横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 6;9:560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00560. eCollection 2018.
2
Risk factors for readmission in schizophrenia patients following involuntary admission.精神分裂症患者非自愿入院后的再入院风险因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0186768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186768. eCollection 2017.
3
Is psychiatry becoming more coercive?
葡萄牙非自愿精神科住院治疗的相关因素。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Apr 20;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00460-4.
精神病学是否变得更具强制性?
BMJ. 2017 Jun 22;357:j2904. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j2904.
4
Determinants of compulsory admissions in a state psychiatric hospital-Case control study.州立精神病院强制入院的决定因素-病例对照研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Jun;35:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
The magnitude of and health system responses to the mental health treatment gap in adults in India and China.中印两国成年人群心理健康治疗缺口的规模及其卫生系统应对措施。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):3074-3084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00160-4. Epub 2016 May 18.
6
Tensions between policy and practice: A qualitative analysis of decisions regarding compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital.政策与实践之间的矛盾:对精神病院强制收治决策的质性分析
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 May-Jun;46:50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
7
Voluntary and Involuntary Psychiatric Admissions in China.中国的自愿和非自愿精神科住院治疗
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1341-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400566. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Taking the Role of the Family Seriously in Treating Chinese Psychiatric Patients: A Confucian Familist Review of China's First Mental Health Act.在治疗中国精神科患者时认真对待家庭的角色:对中国首部《精神卫生法》的儒家家族主义审视
J Med Philos. 2015 Aug;40(4):387-99. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv014. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
9
The first mental health law of China.中国第一部精神卫生法。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Feb;13:72-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
10
Interpretations of legal criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission: a qualitative analysis.非自愿精神科住院法律标准的解读:一项定性分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 25;14:500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0500-x.