Suppr超能文献

在直升机和急诊室环境中使用和不使用夜视镜进行气管插管:一项人体模型研究。

Endotracheal Intubation With and Without Night Vision Goggles in a Helicopter and Emergency Room Setting: A Manikin Study.

作者信息

Gellerfors Mikael, Svensén Christer, Linde Joacim, Lossius Hans Morten, Gryth Dan

机构信息

Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet/Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

SAE Medevac Helicopter, Armed Forces Centre for Defense Medicine (FörmedC), Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2015 Sep;180(9):1006-10. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00583.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Securing the airway by endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a key issue in prehospital critical care. Night vision goggles (NVG) are used by personnel operating in low-light environments. We examined the feasibility of an anesthesiologist performed ETI using NVG in a helicopter setting.

METHODS

Twelve anesthesiologists performed ETI on a manikin in an emergency room (ER) setting and two helicopter settings, with randomization to either rotary wing daylight (RW-D) or rotary wing in total darkness using binocular NVG (RW-NVG). Primary endpoint was intubation time. Secondary endpoints included success rate, Cormack-Lehane (CL) score, and subjective difficulty according to the Visual Analoge Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The median intubation time was shorter for the RW-D compared to the RW-NVG setting (16.5 seconds vs. 30.0 seconds; p = 0,03). We found no difference in median intubation time for the ER and RW-D settings (16.8 seconds vs. 16.5 seconds; p = 0.91). For all scenarios, success rate was 100%. CL and VAS varied between the ER setting (CL 1.8, VAS 2.8), RW-D setting (CL 2.0, VAS 3.0), and RW-NVG setting (CL 3.0, VAS 6.5).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that anesthesiologists successfully and quickly can perform ETI in a helicopter setting both in daylight and in darkness using binocular NVG, but with shorter intubation times in daylight.

摘要

背景

通过气管插管(ETI)确保气道安全是院前重症监护中的关键问题。在低光照环境下工作的人员会使用夜视镜(NVG)。我们研究了麻醉医生在直升机环境中使用NVG进行ETI的可行性。

方法

12名麻醉医生在急诊室(ER)环境以及两个直升机环境中对人体模型进行ETI操作,随机分为旋翼白天(RW-D)组或使用双目NVG在完全黑暗环境下的旋翼组(RW-NVG)。主要终点是插管时间。次要终点包括成功率、Cormack-Lehane(CL)评分以及根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的主观难度。

结果

与RW-NVG环境相比,RW-D环境下的插管时间中位数更短(16.5秒对30.0秒;p = 0.03)。我们发现ER环境和RW-D环境下的插管时间中位数无差异(16.8秒对16.5秒;p = 0.91)。在所有场景中,成功率均为100%。CL和VAS在ER环境(CL 1.8,VAS 2.8)、RW-D环境(CL 2.0,VAS 3.0)和RW-NVG环境(CL 3.0,VAS 6.5)之间有所不同。

结论

本研究表明,麻醉医生使用双目NVG能够在直升机环境中成功且快速地在白天和黑暗条件下进行ETI操作,但在白天的插管时间更短。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验