• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Governors' priorities for public health and chronic disease prevention: a qualitative analysis of State of the State addresses.州长们对公共卫生和慢性病预防的优先事项:对国情咨文的定性分析。
Transl Behav Med. 2015 Sep;5(3):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0323-2.
2
The 2014 governors' races and health care: a campaign web site analysis.2014年州长竞选与医疗保健:竞选网站分析
Inquiry. 2015 May 5;52. doi: 10.1177/0046958015584798. Print 2015.
3
Combating COVID-19 with charisma: Evidence on governor speeches in the United States.用魅力抗击新冠疫情:关于美国州长演讲的证据
Leadersh Q. 2023 May 22:101702. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2023.101702.
4
The Nation's governors look toward reform.
Internist. 1991 Jan;32(1):9-11.
5
A qualitative study of post-settlement influences on State tobacco control funding.关于定居后对国家烟草控制资金影响的定性研究。
Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3 Suppl):46S-56S. doi: 10.1177/1524839904264632.
6
Empowerment or rhetoric? Investigating the role of NHS Foundation Trust governors in the governance of patient safety.赋权还是修辞?调查 NHS 基金会信托治理者在患者安全治理中的作用。
Health Policy. 2013 Aug;111(3):301-10. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
7
Executive summary.执行摘要。
Can J Public Health. 1996 Jan-Feb;87(1):I1-I56.
8
Policy content analysis: Qualitative method for analyzing sub-national insect pollinator legislation.政策内容分析:分析国家以下层面昆虫传粉者立法的定性方法。
MethodsX. 2020 Jan 14;7:100787. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100787. eCollection 2020.
9
Toward Effective Water Pipe Tobacco Control Policy in the United States: Synthesis of Federal, State, and Local Policy Texts.迈向美国有效的水管烟草控制政策:联邦、州和地方政策文本综述
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Jul;31(4):302-309. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.150218-QUAL-736. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
10
What will it take to improve prevention of chronic diseases in Australia? A case study of two national approaches.如何才能改善澳大利亚慢性病的预防工作?对两种国家方法的案例研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 May;41(2):176-181. doi: 10.1071/AH16002.

本文引用的文献

1
Who's your nanny? Choice, paternalism and public health in the age of personal responsibility.谁是你的保姆?个人责任时代的选择、家长主义与公共卫生
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Mar;41 Suppl 1:88-91. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12048.
2
It's all in the lens: differences in views on obesity prevention between advocates and policy makers.关键在于镜片:倡导者与政策制定者对肥胖预防看法的差异。
Child Obes. 2012 Jun;8(3):243-50. doi: 10.1089/chi.2011.0038.
3
Advocacy evaluation: challenges and emerging trends.宣传评估:挑战与新趋势
Health Promot Pract. 2012 Sep;13(5):581-6. doi: 10.1177/1524839912446482. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
4
Individual responsibility or a policy solution--cap and trade for the U.S. diet?个人责任还是政策解决方案——美国饮食的总量管制与交易制度?
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 27;365(17):1561-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1105128.
5
Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue.个人责任与肥胖:争议问题的建设性应对方法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Mar-Apr;29(3):379-87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0739.
6
Bridging the gap: translating research into policy and practice.弥合差距:将研究转化为政策和实践。
Prev Med. 2009 Oct;49(4):313-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
7
Researchers and policymakers: travelers in parallel universes.研究人员与政策制定者:平行宇宙中的行者。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Feb;30(2):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.004.
8
Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward?将科学发现转化为公共卫生行动:公共卫生学院如何推动我们前进?
Public Health Rep. 2006 Jan-Feb;121(1):97-103. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100118.
9
Altering state policy: interest group effectiveness among state-level advocacy groups.
Soc Work. 2005 Jul;50(3):219-27. doi: 10.1093/sw/50.3.219.

州长们对公共卫生和慢性病预防的优先事项:对国情咨文的定性分析。

Governors' priorities for public health and chronic disease prevention: a qualitative analysis of State of the State addresses.

作者信息

Eyler Amy A, Zwald Marissa L

机构信息

Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO 63130 USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2015 Sep;5(3):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0323-2.

DOI:10.1007/s13142-015-0323-2
PMID:26327940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4537464/
Abstract

Governors use State of the State speeches to publicly outline state status, progress, and policy priorities. The purpose of this study was to qualitatively analyze the public health content of State of the State addresses from 2009 to 2013. Speech transcripts were collected and uploaded into NVivo10. Speeches were coded using a priori, general thematic codes followed by detailed sub-coding of public health text. Data was organized by emergent thematic patterns. From 2009 to 2013, 48 governors presented 72 speeches with public health messages. Framing current public health problems and outlining strategies were two of the three main themes that emerged. Problems were often framed using data or emphasizing economic costs. Governors outlined prevention strategies on tobacco, nutrition, or physical activity through increased funding, policies, or partnerships. Speech content provides information on priorities and trends and can be used to inform advocacy efforts. Future research should link these priorities to outcomes of legislation.

摘要

州长们利用国情咨文演讲来公开概述州的状况、进展和政策重点。本研究的目的是对2009年至2013年国情咨文演讲中的公共卫生内容进行定性分析。收集演讲记录并上传到NVivo10中。演讲使用先验的一般主题代码进行编码,随后对公共卫生文本进行详细的子编码。数据按照出现的主题模式进行整理。2009年至2013年,48位州长发表了72次带有公共卫生信息的演讲。构建当前公共卫生问题并概述策略是出现的三个主要主题中的两个。问题通常通过数据或强调经济成本来构建。州长们通过增加资金、政策或伙伴关系,概述了在烟草、营养或体育活动方面的预防策略。演讲内容提供了关于重点和趋势的信息,可用于为宣传工作提供参考。未来的研究应将这些重点与立法成果联系起来。