Şanlı Öner, Erdem Selçuk, Tefik Tzevat
Department of Urology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Urol. 2013 Sep;39(Suppl 1):20-4. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.049.
Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician. The aim of the present review is to outline the main aspects of writing the discussion section of a manuscript. Additionally, we address various issues regarding manuscripts in general. It is advisable to work on a manuscript regularly to avoid losing familiarity with the article. On principle, simple, clear and effective language should be used throughout the text. In addition, a pre-peer review process is recommended to obtain feedback on the manuscript. The discussion section can be written in 3 parts: an introductory paragraph, intermediate paragraphs and a conclusion paragraph. For intermediate paragraphs, a "divide and conquer" approach, meaning a full paragraph describing each of the study endpoints, can be used. In conclusion, academic writing is similar to other skills, and practice makes perfect.
撰写描述研究成果的手稿,虽然并非易事,但却是院士的主要任务。本综述的目的是概述撰写手稿讨论部分的主要方面。此外,我们还将探讨一般手稿的各种问题。建议定期着手处理手稿,以免对手稿内容生疏。原则上,全文应使用简单、清晰且有效的语言。此外,建议进行预同行评审,以获取对手稿的反馈。讨论部分可分为三个部分撰写:引言段落、中间段落和结论段落。对于中间段落,可以采用“分而治之”的方法,即每个段落完整描述一个研究终点。总之,学术写作与其他技能类似,熟能生巧。