• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patients' views on priority setting in neurosurgery: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Gunaratnam Caroline, Bernstein Mark

机构信息

a Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(1):16-22. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1071330. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

DOI:10.3109/02688697.2015.1071330
PMID:26328623
Abstract

OBJECT

Accountability for Reasonableness is an ethical framework which has been implemented in various health care systems to improve and evaluate the fairness of priority setting. This framework is grounded on four mandatory conditions: relevance, publicity, appeals, and enforcement. There have been few studies which have evaluated the patient stakeholders' acceptance of this framework; certainly no studies have been done on patients' views on the prioritization system for allocating patients for operating time in a system with pressure on the resource of inpatient beds. The aim of this study is to examine neurosurgical patients' views on the prioritization of patients for operating theater (OT) time on a daily basis at a tertiary and quaternary referral neurosurgery center.

METHODS

Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted with thirty-seven patients, recruited from the neurosurgery clinic at Toronto Western Hospital. Family members and friends who accompanied the patient to their clinic visit were encouraged to contribute to the discussion. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to thematic analysis using open and axial coding.

RESULTS

Overall, patients are supportive of the concept of a priority-setting system based on fairness, but felt that a few changes would help to improve the fairness of the current system. These changes include lowering the level of priority given to volume-funded cases and providing scheduled surgeries that were previously canceled a higher level of prioritization. Good communication, early notification, and rescheduling canceled surgeries as soon as possible were important factors that directly reflected the patients' confidence level in their doctor, the hospital, and the health care system.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first clinical qualitative study of patients' perspective on a prioritization system used for allocating neurosurgical patients for OT time on a daily basis in a socialized not-for-profit health care system with fixed resources.

摘要

相似文献

1
Patients' views on priority setting in neurosurgery: A qualitative study.
Br J Neurosurg. 2016;30(1):16-22. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1071330. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
2
Priority setting and cardiac surgery: a qualitative case study.优先级设定与心脏手术:一项定性案例研究
Health Policy. 2007 Mar;80(3):444-58. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.004. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
3
Priority setting in a hospital critical care unit: qualitative case study.医院重症监护病房的优先级设定:定性案例研究
Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;31(12):2764-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098440.74735.DE.
4
Neurosurgical patients' perceptions of the "surgeon+": a qualitative study.神经外科患者对“外科医生+”的认知:一项定性研究。
J Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;124(3):849-53. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS15113. Epub 2015 Oct 2.
5
Access to intensive care unit beds for neurosurgery patients: a qualitative case study.神经外科患者使用重症监护病房床位情况:一项定性案例研究。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;74(9):1299-303. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1299.
6
Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework.坦桑尼亚分散式医疗保健重点制定:基于合理性问责框架的评估。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(4):751-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.035. Epub 2010 May 25.
7
What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?加拿大安大略省的医院决策者对于其所在机构中确定优先次序的公平性有何看法?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Jan 21;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-8.
8
Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?公平性与合理的问责制。不同卫生系统以及决策层级中,确定优先事项的决策者的观点是否存在差异?
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Feb;68(4):766-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.011. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation.设有申诉程序的医院优先次序设定:一项定性案例研究与评估
Health Policy. 2005 Jul;73(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.11.002. Epub 2004 Dec 10.
10
SARS and hospital priority setting: a qualitative case study and evaluation.严重急性呼吸综合征与医院优先级设定:一项定性案例研究与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec 19;4(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient prioritisation methods to shorten waiting times for elective surgery: A systematic review of how to improve access to surgery.患者优先排序方法缩短择期手术等待时间:系统评价如何改善手术机会。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 30;16(8):e0256578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256578. eCollection 2021.