Veronesi Francesca, Cadossi Matteo, Giavaresi Gianluca, Martini Lucia, Setti Stefania, Buda Roberto, Giannini Sandro, Fini Milena
Department Rizzoli RIT, Laboratory of Biocompatibility Innovative Technologies and Advanced Therapies, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
I Orthopaedics and Trauma Clinic, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Sep 2;16:233. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0683-2.
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) biophysical stimulation and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) in osteochondral defect healing in comparison to the treatment with scaffold alone. METHODS: An osteochondral lesion of both knees was performed in ten rabbits. One was treated with a collagen scaffold alone and the other with scaffold seeded with BMC. Half of the animals were stimulated by PEMFs (75 Hz, 1.5 mT, 4 h/day) and at 40 d, macroscopic, histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed to evaluate osteochondral defect regeneration. RESULTS: Regarding cartilage, the addition of BMC to the scaffold improved cell parameters and the PEMF stimulation improved both cell and matrix parameters compared with scaffold alone. The combination of BMC and PEMFs further improved osteochondral regeneration: there was an improvement in macroscopic, cartilage cellularity and matrix parameters and a reduction in the percentage of cartilage under the tidemark. Epiphyseal bone healing improved in all the osteochondral defects regardless of treatment, although PEMFs alone did not significantly improve the reconstruction of subchondral bone in comparison to treatment with scaffold alone. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that BMC and PEMFs might have a separate effect on osteochondral regeneration, but it seems that they have a greater effect when used together. Biophysical stimulation is a non-invasive therapy, free from side effects and should be started soon after BMC transplantation to increase the quality of the regenerated tissue. However, because this is the first explorative study on the combination of a biological and a biophysical treatment for osteochondral regeneration, future preclinical and clinical research should be focused on this topic to explore mechanisms of action and the correct clinical translation.
背景:本研究旨在评估脉冲电磁场(PEMF)生物物理刺激与骨髓浓缩物(BMC)联合应用对骨软骨缺损愈合的影响,并与单独使用支架治疗进行比较。 方法:对10只兔子的双膝造成骨软骨损伤。一只仅用胶原支架治疗,另一只用接种了BMC的支架治疗。一半动物接受PEMF刺激(75Hz,1.5mT,每天4小时),在40天时进行宏观、组织学和组织形态计量学分析,以评估骨软骨缺损的再生情况。 结果:在软骨方面,与单独使用支架相比,在支架中添加BMC可改善细胞参数,PEMF刺激可同时改善细胞和基质参数。BMC与PEMF的联合应用进一步改善了骨软骨再生:宏观、软骨细胞密度和基质参数均有改善,潮线以下软骨百分比降低。无论采用何种治疗方法,所有骨软骨缺损的骨骺骨愈合均有所改善,尽管与单独使用支架治疗相比,单独使用PEMF并未显著改善软骨下骨的重建。 结论:结果表明,BMC和PEMF对骨软骨再生可能具有单独的作用,但两者联合使用时似乎具有更大的效果。生物物理刺激是一种无创治疗方法,无副作用,应在BMC移植后尽早开始,以提高再生组织的质量。然而,由于这是关于生物和生物物理联合治疗骨软骨再生的首次探索性研究,未来的临床前和临床研究应聚焦于该主题,以探索作用机制和正确的临床转化。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2016-11
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2024-2
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025-7-10
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021-11-4
J Orthop Translat. 2021-10-11
World J Orthop. 2020-6-18
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015-9
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014-8-11