Marti Jennifer L, Holm Tammy, Randolph Gregory
Division of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 10 Union Square East, Suite 4E11, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Endocrine Surgical Service, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 15 Parkman Street, WACC 460, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
World J Surg. 2016 Feb;40(2):337-43. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3238-7.
The value of routine use of intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring (IONM) in thyroid surgery is controversial. We analyzed the practices of recently fellowship-trained thyroid surgeons from two diverging surgical backgrounds with respect to IONM. We hypothesized that the majority of recently trained surgeons would use IONM, and that it would potentially influence their operative procedure.
A 21-question survey was sent to 56 fellowship-trained endocrine and head and neck surgeons who completed fellowships accredited by the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons or American Head and Neck Society within the past 10 years, examining the demographics of respondents, and details of IONM practice. Groups were compared using the Fisher exact and χ (2) tests.
The response rate for the survey was 76 % (42/56). Overall, 95 % use IONM for some or all of their cases. Sixty percent (n = 25) of respondents always use IONM during thyroid surgery, 36 % (n = 15) use it selectively, and 5 % (n = 2) never use it. We compared respondents who always use IONM (n = 25), to those who selectively or never use it (n = 17). Exposure to IONM during residency or fellowship did not influence use (p = 0.99). However, higher-volume surgeons were more likely to always use IONM (p = 0.036). Among users of IONM, the most common reason given for use was increased surgeon confidence (55 %) and improved safety (54 %). Over 90 % of respondents found reoperative cases and preoperative vocal cord paralysis to be indications for IONM. Among those who always used IONM, 64 % would alter extent of surgery based on IONM findings, compared to only 27 % of selective users.
A survey of recently trained endocrine and head and neck surgeons reveals that the vast majority (95 %) of these surgeons commonly use IONM during thyroid surgery. IONM was more commonly used by higher-volume surgeons. Routine users were more likely to modify surgery based on nerve integrity (i.e., not complete a total thyroidectomy if the nerve loses conduction signal).
甲状腺手术中常规使用术中喉返神经监测(IONM)的价值存在争议。我们分析了来自两种不同手术背景、近期完成专科培训的甲状腺外科医生在IONM方面的做法。我们假设,大多数近期接受培训的外科医生会使用IONM,并且它可能会影响他们的手术操作。
向56名近期完成专科培训的内分泌及头颈外科医生发送了一份包含21个问题的调查问卷,这些医生在过去10年内完成了由美国内分泌外科协会或美国头颈协会认可的专科培训,调查内容包括受访者的人口统计学信息以及IONM的使用细节。使用Fisher精确检验和χ²检验对各组进行比较。
调查的回复率为76%(42/56)。总体而言,95%的医生在部分或所有病例中使用IONM。60%(n = 25)的受访者在甲状腺手术中始终使用IONM,36%(n = 15)选择性使用,5%(n = 2)从不使用。我们将始终使用IONM的受访者(n = 25)与选择性使用或从不使用IONM的受访者(n = 17)进行了比较。住院医师培训或专科培训期间接触IONM对使用情况没有影响(p = 0.99)。然而,手术量较大的外科医生更有可能始终使用IONM(p = 0.036)。在IONM使用者中,使用IONM的最常见原因是提高了外科医生的信心(55%)和安全性(54%)。超过90%的受访者认为再次手术病例和术前声带麻痹是IONM的适应证。在始终使用IONM的人中,64%会根据IONM结果改变手术范围,而选择性使用者中这一比例仅为27%。
对近期接受培训的内分泌及头颈外科医生的一项调查显示,这些外科医生中的绝大多数(95%)在甲状腺手术中普遍使用IONM。手术量较大的外科医生更常使用IONM。常规使用者更有可能根据神经完整性改变手术方式(例如,如果神经失去传导信号,则不进行全甲状腺切除术)。