Thakur Deepali, Malde Anila
Department of Anaesthesiology, LTMMC and LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul-Sep;31(3):360-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.161673.
Peripheral administration of opioids has been suggested for prolongation of regional analgesia. This prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was undertaken to compare the effect of regional (axillary brachial plexus block [ABPB]) versus intramuscular (IM) buprenorphine (2 μg/kg) in adults.
Seventy-five adults undergoing upper limb surgery received ABPB with local anaesthetic (15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 15 ml 2% lignocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000, 9 ml normal saline [NS]). In addition, regional group RB (n = 25) received buprenorphine 2 μg/kg in ABPB and 1 ml NS IM. Systemic Group SB (n = 25) received 1 ml NS in ABPB and buprenorphine 2 μg/kg IM. Group C (n = 25) received 1 ml NS in ABPB and IM. Onset, duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters, sedation score, pain scores using visual analog scale, duration of postoperative analgesia, rescue analgesic (RA) requirement, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were noted.
Demographics, onset and duration of sensory, motor block were similar. RB group had longest duration of analgesia (20.61 ± 1.33 h) compared to SB (10.91 ± 0.90 h) and control group (5.86 ± 0.57 h) (P < 0.05 RB vs. SB/C and SB vs. C). RA requirement was highest in the control group and least in RB group (P = 0.000 RB vs. SB/C and SB vs. C). SB group had a maximum number of side effects (P = 0.041, SB vs. RB/C). Patient satisfaction was highest with group RB (P < 0.05 RB vs. SB/C, and P = 0.06 SB vs. C).
Buprenorphine 2 μg/kg in axillary plexus block provides significantly prolonged analgesia with less RA requirement and greater patient satisfaction compared to IM administration. This is highly suggestive of action on peripheral opioid receptors.
已有人提出经外周给予阿片类药物可延长局部镇痛时间。本前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究旨在比较区域(腋路臂丛神经阻滞[ABPB])与肌肉注射(IM)丁丙诺啡(2μg/kg)对成年人的效果。
75例接受上肢手术的成年人接受了含局部麻醉剂的ABPB(15ml 0.5%布比卡因、15ml含1:200,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因、9ml生理盐水[NS])。此外,区域组RB(n = 25)在ABPB中接受2μg/kg丁丙诺啡并肌肉注射1ml NS。全身组SB(n = 25)在ABPB中接受1ml NS并肌肉注射2μg/kg丁丙诺啡。C组(n = 25)在ABPB和肌肉注射中均接受1ml NS。记录起效时间、感觉和运动阻滞持续时间、血流动力学参数、镇静评分、使用视觉模拟量表的疼痛评分、术后镇痛持续时间、补救性镇痛(RA)需求、不良事件及患者满意度。
人口统计学数据、感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间及持续时间相似。与SB组(10.91±0.90小时)和对照组(5.86±0.57小时)相比,RB组的镇痛持续时间最长(20.61±1.33小时)(RB组与SB/C组及SB组与C组比较,P<0.05)。对照组的RA需求最高,RB组最低(RB组与SB/C组及SB组与C组比较,P = 0.000)。SB组的副作用最多(SB组与RB/C组比较,P = 0.041)。RB组的患者满意度最高(RB组与SB/C组比较,P<0.05;SB组与C组比较,P = 0.06)。
与肌肉注射相比,腋路臂丛神经阻滞中使用2μg/kg丁丙诺啡可显著延长镇痛时间且RA需求更少,患者满意度更高。这强烈提示其作用于外周阿片受体。