Research Group of Quantitative Psychology and Individual Differences; Centre for Social and Cultural Psychology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; email:
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:263-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033550. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
The review first discusses componential explanations of automaticity, which specify non/automaticity features (e.g., un/controlled, un/conscious, non/efficient, fast/slow) and their interrelations. Reframing these features as factors that influence processes (e.g., goals, attention, and time) broadens the range of factors that can be considered (e.g., adding stimulus intensity and representational quality). The evidence reviewed challenges the view of a perfect coherence among goals, attention, and consciousness, and supports the alternative view that (a) these and other factors influence the quality of representations in an additive way (e.g., little time can be compensated by extra attention or extra stimulus intensity) and that (b) a first threshold of this quality is required for unconscious processing and a second threshold for conscious processing. The review closes with a discussion of causal explanations of automaticity, which specify factors involved in automatization such as repetition and complexity, and a discussion of mechanistic explanations, which specify the low-level processes underlying automatization.
这段文本的译文如下:
该综述首先讨论了自动性的成分解释,这些解释指定了非/自动性特征(例如,无/控制、无/意识、非/有效、快/慢)及其相互关系。将这些特征重新定义为影响过程的因素(例如,目标、注意力和时间),拓宽了可以考虑的因素范围(例如,增加刺激强度和代表性质量)。综述的证据挑战了目标、注意力和意识之间完美一致的观点,并支持了另一种观点,即(a)这些因素和其他因素以累加的方式影响表示的质量(例如,额外的注意力或额外的刺激强度可以弥补时间不足),并且(b)无意识加工需要该质量的第一个阈值,而有意识加工需要第二个阈值。该综述最后讨论了自动性的因果解释,这些解释指定了自动形成过程中涉及的因素,如重复和复杂性,以及机制解释,这些解释指定了自动形成过程的底层低水平过程。