Suppr超能文献

蔓延至研究伦理领域的科学争端:对玛丽亚·塞西莉亚·德·索萨·米纳约的访谈

Scientific disputes that spill over into Research Ethics: interview with Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo.

作者信息

Minayo Maria Cecília de Souza

机构信息

Centro Latino-Americano de Estudos de Violência e Saúde Jorge Carelli, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BR,

出版信息

Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Sep;20(9):2693-6. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232015209.11862015.

Abstract

This is an interview with Maria Cecília de Souza Minayo, by university lecturers Iara Coelho Zito Guerriero and Maria Lúcia Magalhães Bosi. It reflects the heat of the current debates surrounding implementation of a specific protocol for evaluation of research in the Human and Social Sciences (HSS), vis-à-vis the current rules set by the National Health Council, which have a clearly biomedical bias. The interview covers the difficulties of introducing appropriate and fair rules for judgment of HSS projects, in the face of a hegemonic understanding of the very concept of science by biologists and medical doctors, who tend not to recognize other approaches unless those approaches adopt their frames of reference. In this case, the National Health Council becomes the arena of this polemic, leading researchers in the human and social sciences to ask themselves whether the health sector has the competency to create rules for other areas of knowledge.

摘要

这是大学讲师伊拉·科埃略·齐托·格雷里埃罗和玛丽亚·卢西亚·马加良斯·博西对玛丽亚·塞西莉亚·德·索萨·米纳约进行的一次访谈。它反映了当前围绕实施一项针对人文社会科学(HSS)研究评估的特定协议展开的激烈辩论,这与国家卫生委员会制定的现行规则形成对比,现行规则明显带有生物医学倾向。访谈涉及在面对生物学家和医生对科学概念的霸权性理解时,为人文社会科学项目引入适当且公平的评判规则所面临的困难,这些生物学家和医生往往不认可其他方法,除非这些方法采用他们的参照框架。在这种情况下,国家卫生委员会成为了这场论战的舞台,促使人文社会科学领域的研究人员思考卫生部门是否有能力为其他知识领域制定规则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验