Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology, Center for Research on Interpersonal Violence (CRIV), Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Sep 11;46:e232. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23000845.
In this response, I focus on clarifying my arguments, highlighting consensus, and addressing competing views about the utility of polygenic scores (PGSs) for social science. I also discuss an assortment of expansions to my arguments and suggest alternative approaches. I conclude by reiterating the need for caution and appropriate scientific skepticism.
在本次回复中，我将重点澄清我的观点，突出共识，并解决有关多基因评分（PGS）在社会科学中效用的不同观点。我还将讨论对我观点的一系列扩展，并提出替代方法。最后，我再次强调需要谨慎和适当的科学怀疑态度。
