Greene Nathaniel T, Mattingly Jameson K, Jenkins Herman A, Tollin Daniel J, Easter James R, Cass Stephen P
*Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine †Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora ‡Cochlear Boulder LLC, Boulder, Colorado, U.S.A.
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Sep;36(9):1554-61. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000838.
Cochlear implants (CIs) designed for hearing preservation will not alter mechanical properties of the middle and inner ears as measured by intracochlear pressure (P(IC)) and stapes velocity (Vstap).
CIs designed to provide combined electroacoustic stimulation are now available. To maintain functional acoustic hearing, it is important to know if a CI electrode can alter middle or inner ear mechanics because any alteration could contribute to elevated low-frequency thresholds in electroacoustic stimulation patients.
Seven human cadaveric temporal bones were prepared, and pure-tone stimuli from 120 Hz to 10 kHz were presented at a range of intensities up to 110 dB sound pressure level. P(IC) in the scala vestibuli (P(SV)) and tympani (PST) were measured with fiber-optic pressure sensors concurrently with VStap using laser Doppler vibrometry. Five CI electrodes from two different manufacturers with varying dimensions were inserted via a round window approach at six different depths (16-25 mm).
The responses of P(IC) and VStap to acoustic stimulation were assessed as a function of stimulus frequency, normalized to sound pressure level in the external auditory canal, at baseline and electrode-inserted conditions. Responses measured with electrodes inserted were generally within approximately 5 dB of baseline, indicating little effect of CI electrode insertion on P(IC) and VStap. Overall, mean differences across conditions were small for all responses, and no substantial differences were consistently visible across electrode types.
Results suggest that the influence of a CI electrode on middle and inner ear mechanics is minimal despite variation in electrode lengths and configurations.
专为听力保留设计的人工耳蜗(CI)不会改变中耳和内耳的机械特性,这可通过蜗内压力(P(IC))和镫骨速度(Vstap)来衡量。
现已出现旨在提供联合电声刺激的人工耳蜗。为维持功能性听觉,了解CI电极是否会改变中耳或内耳的力学特性很重要,因为任何改变都可能导致电声刺激患者低频阈值升高。
准备了七个人类尸体颞骨,并在高达110 dB声压级的一系列强度下呈现120Hz至10kHz的纯音刺激。使用光纤压力传感器测量前庭阶(P(SV))和鼓阶(PST)中的P(IC),同时使用激光多普勒振动测量法测量VStap。通过圆窗途径,将来自两个不同制造商、尺寸各异的五个CI电极插入六个不同深度(16 - 25mm)。
在基线和电极插入条件下,将P(IC)和VStap对声刺激的反应评估为刺激频率(归一化到外耳道声压级)的函数。插入电极后测量的反应通常在基线的约5dB范围内,表明CI电极插入对P(IC)和VStap影响很小。总体而言,所有反应在不同条件下的平均差异都很小,并且在不同电极类型之间没有始终可见的实质性差异。
结果表明,尽管电极长度和配置存在差异,但CI电极对中耳和内耳力学的影响最小。