Suppr超能文献

无法获取选定刺激物的基于视频的偏好评估是否有效?

Are video-based preference assessments without access to selected stimuli effective?

作者信息

Clark Daniel R, Donaldson Jeanne M, Kahng SungWoo

机构信息

KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE AND UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE COUNTY.

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Dec;48(4):895-900. doi: 10.1002/jaba.246. Epub 2015 Aug 30.

Abstract

This study extended the findings of Snyder, Higbee, and Dayton (2012) by presenting items via video during a paired-stimulus preference assessment but without providing access contingent on selection. Subsequently, items identified as highly, moderately, and less preferred were assessed in a concurrent reinforcer assessment, which suggested that these items did indeed function as reinforcers.

摘要

本研究扩展了斯奈德、希金博特姆和代顿(2012年)的研究结果,即在配对刺激偏好评估期间通过视频呈现物品,但不根据选择提供接触机会。随后,在同时进行的强化物评估中对被确定为高度偏好、中度偏好和低度偏好的物品进行了评估,这表明这些物品确实起到了强化物的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验