• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过识别偏好类别提高配对刺激偏好评估的效率。

Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.

作者信息

Ciccone Francis J, Graff Richard B, Ahearn William H

机构信息

New England Center for Children and Northeastern University.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.

DOI:10.1002/jaba.190
PMID:25754896
Abstract

A paired-stimulus preference assessment was conducted for 6 individuals with developmental disabilities. We selected stimuli that were representatives of 4 categories: chocolate, salty and crunchy, gummy, and fruit and vegetable. For all 6 participants, at least 3 of the 5 most preferred items came from the same category. On subsequent reinforcer assessments, items from the highest ranked preference category, some of which were included in the preference assessments and some of which were not, functioned as reinforcers. These findings suggest that after categories of preferred items are identified, clinicians may be able to identify reinforcers for some individuals without conducting additional assessments.

摘要

对6名发育障碍患者进行了配对刺激偏好评估。我们选择了代表4类的刺激物:巧克力、咸脆食品、软糖以及水果和蔬菜。对于所有6名参与者来说,5个最偏好项目中至少有3个来自同一类别。在随后的强化物评估中,来自排名最高偏好类别的项目(其中一些包含在偏好评估中,一些则未包含)起到了强化物的作用。这些发现表明,在确定了偏好项目的类别之后,临床医生或许能够在不进行额外评估的情况下为一些个体确定强化物。

相似文献

1
Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.通过识别偏好类别提高配对刺激偏好评估的效率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Spring;48(1):221-6. doi: 10.1002/jaba.190.
2
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
3
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
4
Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.将不熟悉的刺激物纳入自闭症儿童偏好评估中。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Fall;46(3):689-94. doi: 10.1002/jaba.56. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
5
Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.评估识别社会强化物的方法的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):113-35. doi: 10.1002/jaba.107.
6
Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.对通过预处理和每日简短偏好评估确定的刺激的相对强化效果进行检查。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):463-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-463.
7
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
8
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
9
Evaluating the use of computerized stimulus preference assessments in foster care.评估计算机化刺激偏好评估在寄养照料中的应用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Fall;47(3):470-84. doi: 10.1002/jaba.148. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
10
Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.使用图片评估发育障碍个体的强化物。
Behav Modif. 2003 Sep;27(4):470-83. doi: 10.1177/0145445503255602.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Our Understanding of Behavioral Intervention: 1980 to 2020 for Individuals Diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder.我们对行为干预的理解进展:1980年至2020年针对被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍的个体
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Dec;51(12):4395-4410. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04481-9.