Koga Yasutaka, Fujita Motoki, Yagi Takeshi, Nakahara Takashi, Miyauchi Takashi, Kaneda Kotaro, Kawamura Yoshikatsu, Oda Yasutaka, Tsuruta Ryosuke
Advanced Medical Emergency and Critical Care Center, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Acute and General Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:226-31. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
To determine the effects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with AutoPulse™ (LDB-CPR) on post-resuscitation injuries identified by post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT). AutoPulse™ is a novel mechanical chest-compression device with a load-distributing band (LDB) that may affect post-resuscitation injury identified by PMCT.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of non-traumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients whose death was confirmed in our emergency department between October 2009 and September 2014. Patients were divided according to whether LDB-CPR (LDB-CPR group) or manual CPR only (manual CPR only group) was performed. The background characteristics and post-resuscitation injuries identified by PMCT were compared between both groups. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for posterior rib fracture and abdominal injury.
Overall, 323 patients were evaluated, with 241 (74.6%) in the LDB-CPR group. The total duration of CPR was significantly longer in the LDB-CPR group than in the manual CPR only group. Posterior rib fracture, hemoperitoneum, and retroperitoneal hemorrhage were significantly more frequent in the LDB-CPR group. The frequencies of anterior/lateral rib and sternum fracture were similar in both groups. Pneumothorax tended to be more frequent in the LDB-CPR group, although not significantly. LDB-CPR was an independent risk factor for posterior rib fracture (odds ratio 30.57, 95% confidence interval 4.15-225.49, P=0.001) and abdominal injury (odds ratio 4.93, 95% confidence interval 1.88-12.95, P=0.001).
LDB-CPR was associated with higher frequencies of posterior rib fracture and abdominal injury identified by PMCT. PMCT findings should be carefully examined after LDB-CPR.
确定使用AutoPulse™(负载分配带心肺复苏,LDB-CPR)进行心肺复苏(CPR)对尸检计算机断层扫描(PMCT)所识别的复苏后损伤的影响。AutoPulse™是一种新型机械胸外按压设备,带有负载分配带(LDB),可能会影响PMCT所识别的复苏后损伤。
我们对2009年10月至2014年9月期间在我院急诊科确诊死亡的非创伤性成年院外心脏骤停患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据是否进行LDB-CPR(LDB-CPR组)或仅进行徒手CPR(仅徒手CPR组)对患者进行分组。比较两组的背景特征以及PMCT所识别的复苏后损伤。采用逻辑回归分析确定后肋骨骨折和腹部损伤的危险因素。
总体而言,共评估了323例患者,其中LDB-CPR组241例(74.6%)。LDB-CPR组的CPR总时长显著长于仅徒手CPR组。LDB-CPR组后肋骨骨折、血腹和腹膜后出血的发生率显著更高。两组前/侧肋骨和胸骨骨折的发生率相似。LDB-CPR组气胸发生率虽无显著差异,但有更高的趋势。LDB-CPR是后肋骨骨折(比值比30.57,95%置信区间4.15 - 225.49,P = 0.001)和腹部损伤(比值比4.93,95%置信区间1.88 - 12.95,P = 0.001)的独立危险因素。
LDB-CPR与PMCT所识别的后肋骨骨折和腹部损伤的较高发生率相关。在LDB-CPR后应仔细检查PMCT结果。