Hoftun Farbu Bjørn, Hagemo Jostein, Rehn Marius
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Olav's University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Institute of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0329164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329164. eCollection 2025.
Both cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and ischaemia could lead to abdominal organ injury. However, the importance of abdominal injury in cardiac arrest remains uncertain. We aimed to systematically review indexed literature to describe incidence of abdominal injury after non-traumatic cardiac arrest and associations with outcome.
We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus up to 12th September 2024 for studies reporting differences in outcomes between patients with and without abdominal injury, and all studies reporting abdominal adverse events after cardiac arrest. Two independent reviewers screened articles for eligibility. One reviewer extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Injuries were defined as traumatic or ischaemic, either in the studies or otherwise by the reviewers. Results were summarized and presented in tables and Forest plots. We followed the PRISMA guidelines, and registered the study in PROSPERO.
We included 68 studies and 140 case reports. Most studies were single-centre. Quantitative synthesis of evidence was not feasible given high heterogeneity and risk of bias. Traumatic injuries affected mostly liver and spleen, with incidences from 0% to 15%, reaching 29% in one study of mechanical chest compressions. Life-threatening injuries were uncommon. The incidence of ischaemic injury was dependent on assessment method; 7% to 28% had liver injury, 0.7% to 2.5% was diagnosed with non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia, 82% to 100% had intestinal injury measured by biomarkers. Ischaemic injuries were associated with mortality.
In this comprehensive review of abdominal injuries following cardiac arrest, CPR-related traumatic injuries were uncommon, but should be considered in patients with unexplained clinical deterioration. Ischaemic injury incidence ranged from 0.7% to 100%, and was consistently associated with mortality. Whether abdominal ischaemia independently contributes to poor outcomes remains unresolved and warrants further investigation. PROSPERO ID: CRD42022311508.
心肺复苏(CPR)和缺血均可能导致腹部器官损伤。然而,心脏骤停时腹部损伤的重要性仍不确定。我们旨在系统回顾索引文献,以描述非创伤性心脏骤停后腹部损伤的发生率及其与预后的关联。
我们检索了截至2024年9月12日的MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Scopus,以查找报告有或无腹部损伤患者预后差异的研究,以及所有报告心脏骤停后腹部不良事件的研究。两名独立评审员筛选文章的合格性。一名评审员提取数据并使用关键评估技能计划清单评估偏倚风险。损伤在研究中或由评审员定义为创伤性或缺血性。结果进行了总结,并以表格和森林图呈现。我们遵循PRISMA指南,并在PROSPERO中注册了该研究。
我们纳入了68项研究和140例病例报告。大多数研究为单中心研究。鉴于高度异质性和偏倚风险,证据的定量综合不可行。创伤性损伤主要影响肝脏和脾脏,发生率为0%至15%,在一项机械胸外按压研究中达到29%。危及生命的损伤并不常见。缺血性损伤的发生率取决于评估方法;7%至28%有肝脏损伤,0.7%至2.5%被诊断为非闭塞性肠系膜缺血,82%至100%通过生物标志物检测有肠道损伤。缺血性损伤与死亡率相关。
在本次对心脏骤停后腹部损伤的全面综述中,与心肺复苏相关的创伤性损伤并不常见,但对于原因不明的临床病情恶化患者应予以考虑。缺血性损伤发生率为0.7%至100%,并始终与死亡率相关。腹部缺血是否独立导致不良预后仍未解决,值得进一步研究。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022311508。