Halbert Caitlin, Pagkratis Spyridon, Yang Jie, Meng Ziqi, Altieri Maria S, Parikh Purvi, Pryor Aurora, Talamini Mark, Telem Dana A
Surgery, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2239-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4485-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
Early reports of higher complication rates, specifically bile duct injuries, raised concerns over the safety of laparoscopy over open cholecystectomy. This study aims to ascertain the rate, management, and perioperative outcomes of bile duct injury in an era beyond the laparoscopic learning curve.
The New York State (NYS) Planning and Research Cooperative System longitudinal administrative database was used to identify patients. From 2005 to 2010, 156,315 patients were identified who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis or acute or chronic cholecystitis. Patients were then tracked with unique identifiers for common bile duct injury. Common bile duct injury was identified by ICD-9 and CPT diagnosis and procedure codes for patients who subsequently underwent hepatectomy, hepaticojejunostomy, or other bile duct surgery.
From 2005 to 2010, 156,958 patients were identified who had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis or acute or chronic cholecystitis. Of the total patients, 149 patients underwent a biliary duct procedure within a year. Twenty-four of them were diagnosed with gallbladder cancer and excluded, leaving 125 for further analysis. The biliary injuries were identified at a rate of 0.080 %. Thirty-one of those patients (24.8 %) underwent hepatectomy, 40 patients (32.0 %) underwent hepaticoenterostomy, and 54 patients (43.2 %) underwent primary repair of the bile duct. Thirty-two (26 %) patients were repaired on the same day of their initial procedure. Of the remaining 93 patients, 38 (30 %) were repaired within 10 days, seven (6 %) repaired between 11 and 20 days, and 48 (38 %) patients over 21 days from injury.
In NYS, the rate of bile duct injury has now decreased to 0.08 % and mirrors the historical figures quoted for open cholecystectomy. This improvement likely reflects increased experience, improved instrumentation, and movement beyond the "learning curve."
早期关于较高并发症发生率的报道,尤其是胆管损伤,引发了对腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性高于开腹胆囊切除术的担忧。本研究旨在确定在腹腔镜学习曲线之后的时代,胆管损伤的发生率、处理方式及围手术期结局。
使用纽约州(NYS)规划与研究合作系统纵向管理数据库来识别患者。2005年至2010年,识别出156,315例因症状性胆石症或急性或慢性胆囊炎接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。然后用唯一标识符追踪患者是否发生胆总管损伤。通过ICD - 9和CPT诊断及手术编码识别随后接受肝切除术、肝空肠吻合术或其他胆管手术的患者的胆总管损伤。
2005年至2010年,识别出156,958例因症状性胆石症或急性或慢性胆囊炎接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。在所有患者中,149例在一年内接受了胆管手术。其中24例被诊断为胆囊癌并被排除,其余125例进行进一步分析。胆管损伤发生率为0.080%。其中31例患者(24.8%)接受了肝切除术,40例患者(32.0%)接受了肝肠吻合术,54例患者(43.2%)接受了胆管一期修复。32例(26%)患者在初次手术当天进行了修复。在其余93例患者中,38例(30%)在10天内进行了修复,7例(6%)在11至20天之间进行了修复,48例(38%)患者在受伤21天以上进行了修复。
在纽约州,胆管损伤发生率现已降至0.08%,与开腹胆囊切除术引用的历史数据相当。这种改善可能反映了经验的增加、器械的改进以及跨越“学习曲线”。