Suppr超能文献

在腹腔镜修复复杂食管裂孔疝过程中使用带生物补片加强的小腿松弛切口。

The use of crural relaxing incisions with biologic mesh reinforcement during laparoscopic repair of complex hiatal hernias.

作者信息

Crespin Oscar M, Yates Robert B, Martin Ana V, Pellegrini Carlos A, Oelschlager Brant K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2179-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4522-1. Epub 2015 Sep 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair has a better chance of success if the hiatus is closed without tension. This study attempts to answer the following questions: (1) What is the rate of hiatal hernia recurrence in patients who undergo hiatal closure with diaphragmatic relaxing incisions? (2) Can biologic mesh be safely substituted for synthetic mesh as coverage of the relaxing incisions?

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair at our institution between 2007 and 2013 and reviewed their clinical records. Radiologic recurrence was identified by an experienced radiologist and defined as the presence of any abdominal contents located above the diaphragm on esophagram. Clinical recurrence was defined as little or no improvement in symptoms, the development of a new symptom, or the need for medical, endoscopic, or surgical treatment of postoperative symptoms.

RESULTS

A minimum of 6 months of radiologic and clinical follow-up was available for 146 (40 %) patients, including 16 with relaxing incisions. There were 66 (45 %) recurrent hernias detected on esophagram. There was no difference in the rate of recurrent hiatal hernia among the three groups: Primary closure of the hiatus (21/36 [58 %]), primary closure with biologic mesh reinforcement (36/94 [38 %]), and relaxing incision with biologic mesh reinforcement (9/16 [56 %]; p = 0.428). Two reoperations were performed on patients who underwent left relaxing incisions and developed symptomatic diaphragmatic hernias through the left relaxing incisions. There were no complications associated with use of biologic mesh at the hiatus.

CONCLUSIONS

Rate of recurrent hiatal hernia is similar between patients who undergo diaphragmatic relaxing incisions and patients who undergo primary hiatal closure. Relaxing incisions can be safely performed on either crus; however, biologic mesh should not be used to patch a left-sided relaxing incision due to the risk of developing a diaphragmatic hernia.

摘要

引言

如果在无张力的情况下关闭裂孔,腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术成功的几率会更高。本研究试图回答以下问题:(1)接受裂孔关闭加膈肌松弛切口的患者食管裂孔疝复发率是多少?(2)生物补片能否安全地替代合成补片用于覆盖松弛切口?

方法

我们确定了2007年至2013年期间在本机构接受腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的所有患者,并回顾了他们的临床记录。由经验丰富的放射科医生确定影像学复发,定义为食管造影显示膈肌上方存在任何腹腔内容物。临床复发定义为症状改善很少或没有改善、出现新症状,或需要对术后症状进行药物、内镜或手术治疗。

结果

146例(40%)患者至少有6个月的影像学和临床随访资料,其中16例有松弛切口。食管造影发现66例(45%)复发疝。三组间食管裂孔疝复发率无差异:裂孔一期关闭(21/36 [58%])、生物补片加固一期关闭(36/94 [38%])、生物补片加固松弛切口(9/16 [56%];p = 0.428)。对接受左侧松弛切口且通过左侧松弛切口出现有症状的膈肌疝的患者进行了两次再次手术。在裂孔处使用生物补片未出现并发症。

结论

接受膈肌松弛切口的患者与接受裂孔一期关闭的患者食管裂孔疝复发率相似。两侧脚均可安全地进行松弛切口;然而,由于有发生膈肌疝的风险,生物补片不应用于修补左侧松弛切口。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验