• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜修补术治疗 III/IV 型巨大食管裂孔疝的单中心经验。

Impact of laparoscopic repair on type III/IV giant paraesophageal hernias: a single-center experience.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Surgical Center GISC, Mansoura University, Gehan Street, Mansoura, 35511, Al Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.

出版信息

Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1555-1570. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02851-7. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-023-02851-7
PMID:37642773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10700459/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Giant paraesophageal hernia (GPEH) is a challenging problem for surgeons because of its high recurrence rate. This study was conducted to compare the outcomes in type IV vs. type III GPEHs after laparoscopic repair. Other outcomes included peri-operative morbidity and long-term quality of life.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 130 GPEH patients in a period between 2010 and 2019 underwent a tailored laparoscopic repair in our tertiary center with a minimum follow-up of 48 months. Operative steps included hernial sac excision, crural repair, relaxing incisions, and mesh cruroplasty with special indications.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 90 patients with type III and 40 patients with type IV GPEH. Type IV GPEH patients were older, more fragile, and scored worse on ASA classification, aside from having a more challenging surgical technique (wider crura, weaker muscles, increased need for release incisions, and mesh cruroplasty).Type IV GPEHs had a prolonged operative durations, and a higher conversion rate. Additionally, the same group showed increased morbidity, mortality, and re-operation rates. With a mean follow-up of 65 months (range 48-150 months), the incidence of recurrence was 20.7%, with an increased incidence in type IV GPEH (37.5% vs. 13.33% in type III GPEH). Type IV GPEH, low pre-operative albumin, larger crural defect, and low surgeon experience were significant risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of GPEH.

CONCLUSION

Type IV GPEH has a higher peri-operative morbidity and recurrence rate; so, a more tailored laparoscopic repair with a high surgeon experience is needed.

摘要

目的

巨大食管裂孔疝(GPEH)因其高复发率,对外科医生来说是一个具有挑战性的问题。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜修补术后 IV 型与 III 型 GPEH 的结果。其他结果包括围手术期发病率和长期生活质量。

方法

对 2010 年至 2019 年期间在我们的三级中心接受定制腹腔镜修复的 130 例 GPEH 患者进行回顾性分析,随访时间至少为 48 个月。手术步骤包括疝囊切除、裂孔修复、松弛切口和带有特殊指征的网片成型。

结果

本研究纳入了 90 例 III 型和 40 例 IV 型 GPEH 患者。IV 型 GPEH 患者年龄较大、身体较脆弱、ASA 分级较差,除了手术技术更具挑战性(更宽的裂孔、更弱的肌肉、增加释放切口的需求和网片成型)外。IV 型 GPEH 的手术时间延长,转换率更高。此外,该组的发病率、死亡率和再次手术率也增加。平均随访 65 个月(范围 48-150 个月),复发率为 20.7%,IV 型 GPEH 的复发率增加(37.5% vs. III 型 GPEH 的 13.33%)。IV 型 GPEH、术前白蛋白水平低、裂孔较大、外科医生经验低是 GPEH 腹腔镜修补术后复发的显著危险因素。

结论

IV 型 GPEH 围手术期发病率和复发率较高;因此,需要更具针对性的腹腔镜修复,并由经验丰富的外科医生进行操作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/befa8436fa50/10029_2023_2851_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/ec80d32a9410/10029_2023_2851_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/5fb440b26a80/10029_2023_2851_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/16b48a627273/10029_2023_2851_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/55dcf65ff4b9/10029_2023_2851_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/befa8436fa50/10029_2023_2851_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/ec80d32a9410/10029_2023_2851_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/5fb440b26a80/10029_2023_2851_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/16b48a627273/10029_2023_2851_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/55dcf65ff4b9/10029_2023_2851_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/050a/10700459/befa8436fa50/10029_2023_2851_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of laparoscopic repair on type III/IV giant paraesophageal hernias: a single-center experience.腹腔镜修补术治疗 III/IV 型巨大食管裂孔疝的单中心经验。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1555-1570. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02851-7. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
2
Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach.巨大食管旁疝的治疗:支持腹腔镜手术入路。
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):909-919. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1706-8. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
3
Laparoscopic repair of type III/IV giant para-oesophageal herniae with biological prosthesis: a single centre experience.使用生物假体腹腔镜修复III/IV型巨大食管旁疝:单中心经验
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):387-396. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01888-x. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
4
Combination of Surgical Technique and Bioresorbable Mesh Reinforcement of the Crural Repair Leads to Low Early Hernia Recurrence Rates with Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中采用手术技术联合可吸收补片加强腹股沟修补可降低早期疝复发率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jul;24(7):1477-1481. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04358-y. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
Laparoscopic management of large hiatal hernia: mesh method with the use of ProGrip mesh versus standard crural repair.腹腔镜治疗巨大食管裂孔疝:使用 ProGrip 网片的网片方法与标准裂孔修补术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3592-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6087-2. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
6
The use of crural relaxing incisions with biologic mesh reinforcement during laparoscopic repair of complex hiatal hernias.在腹腔镜修复复杂食管裂孔疝过程中使用带生物补片加强的小腿松弛切口。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2179-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4522-1. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
7
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: critical steps and adjunct techniques to minimize recurrence.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术:减少复发的关键步骤及辅助技术
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013 Oct;23(5):429-35. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182a12716.
8
Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.腹腔镜后腘绳肌成形术:一种个体化的治疗方法。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
9
Medium-term safety and efficacy profile of paraesophageal hernia repair with Phasix-ST mesh: a single-institution experience.使用Phasix-ST补片修复食管旁疝的中期安全性和疗效概况:单机构经验
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):279-286. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02528-z. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
10
Prospective study of giant paraesophageal hernia repair with 1-year follow-up.前瞻性研究:1 年随访的巨大食管裂孔疝修补术。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;154(2):743-751. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.138. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Body mass index should be considered as an indicator for laparoscopic surgery or robot-assisted surgery selection in patients with hiatal hernia.体重指数应被视为食管裂孔疝患者选择腹腔镜手术或机器人辅助手术的一个指标。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):3991-4004. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2128. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Laparoscopic approach in the management of diaphragmatic eventration in adults: gastrointestinal surgical perspective.腹腔镜技术在成人膈膨升治疗中的应用:胃肠外科视角。
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):555-563. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01665-7. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Poor Metabolic Profile Is an Independent Risk Factor for Recurrence After Hiatal Hernia Repair When Using Tension-Free Mesh.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Jan;33(1):32-37. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0154. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
2
Impact of surgical repair on type IV paraesophageal hernias (PEHs).手术修复对 IV 型食管裂孔疝(PEH)的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5467-5475. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08828-w. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
3
Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia for elderly patients.老年患者巨大食管裂孔疝的腹腔镜修补术
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Apr;9(8):704. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1495.
4
Age-related outcomes in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Is there a "too old" for antireflux surgery?腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的年龄相关结局:抗反流手术是否存在“年龄过大”的情况?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07489-5. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
5
Laparoscopic treatment of giant hiatal hernia with or without mesh reinforcement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜治疗有或无网片加强的巨大食管裂孔疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2020 May;77:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
Octogenarians exhibit quality of life improvement but increased morbidity after paraesophageal hernia repair.八旬老人行食管裂孔疝修补术后生活质量改善但发病率增加。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jun;219(6):958-962. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.014. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
7
True Short Esophagus in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Old Controversies With New Perspectives.胃食管反流病中的真正短食管:旧争议与新视角。
Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):331-338. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003582.
8
Necessity of fundoplication and mesh in the repair of the different types of paraesophageal hernia.胃底折叠术和补片在不同类型食管旁疝修补中的必要性。
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019 Apr-Jun;82(2):251-256.
9
Who benefits more in osteoporotic fractures: Pedicle screw instrumentation or kyphoplasty for American Society of Anesthesiologists II/III patients?对于美国麻醉医师协会II/III级患者,在骨质疏松性骨折中,椎弓根螺钉内固定术和椎体后凸成形术哪种获益更多?
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):232-237. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_55_18.
10
Predictors of Hiatal Hernia Recurrence After Laparoscopic Anti-reflux Surgery with Hiatal Hernia Repair: a Prospective Database Analysis.腹腔镜抗反流手术联合食管裂孔疝修补术后食管裂孔疝复发的预测因素:前瞻性数据库分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Apr;23(4):696-701. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04073-0. Epub 2019 Jan 7.