Celeng Csilla, Vadvala Harshna, Puchner Stefan, Pursnani Amit, Sharma Umesh, Kovacs Attila, Maurovich-Horvat Pâl, Hoffmann Udo, Ghoshhajra Brian
Cardiovascular Imaging, Cardiac MR PET CT Program, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
MTA-SE Cardiovascular Imaging Research Group, Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 68 Varosmajor Street, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;32(1):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0755-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
To define the optimal systolic phase for dual-source computed tomography angiography using an absolute reconstruction delay time after the R-R interval based on the coronary artery motion, we analyzed images reconstructed between 200 and 420 miliseconds (ms) after the R wave at 20 ms increments in 21 patients. Based on the American Heart Association coronary segmentation guidelines, the origin of six coronary artery landmarks (RCA, AM1, PDA, LM, OM1, and D2) were selected to calculate the coronary artery motion velocity. The velocity of the given landmark was defined as the quotient of the route and the length of the time interval. The x, y and z-coordinates of the selected landmark were recorded, and were used for the calculation of the 3D route of coronary artery motion by using a specific equation. Differences in velocities were assessed by analysis of variance for repeated measures; Bonferroni post hoc tests were used for multiple pair wise comparisons. 1488 landmarks were measured (6 locations at 12 systolic time points) in 21 patients and were analyzed. The mean values of the minimum velocities were calculated separately for each heart rate group (i.e. <65; 65-80; and >80 bpm). The mean lowest coronary artery velocities in each segment occurred in the middle period of each time interval of the acquired systolic phase i.e. 280-340 ms. No differences were found in the minimal coronary artery velocities between the three HR groups, with the exception of the AM1 branch (p = 0.00495) between <65 and >80 bpm (p = 0.03), and at HRs of 65-80 versus >80 bpm (p = 0.006). During an absolute delay of 200-420 ms after the R-wave, the ideal reconstruction interval varies significantly among coronary artery segments. Decreased velocities occur between 280 to 340 ms. Therefore a narrow range of systolic intervals, rather than a single phase, should be acquired.
为了基于冠状动脉运动,利用R-R间期后的绝对重建延迟时间来确定双源计算机断层扫描血管造影的最佳收缩期,我们分析了21例患者在R波后200至420毫秒(ms)之间以20 ms增量重建的图像。根据美国心脏协会冠状动脉分段指南,选择六个冠状动脉标志点(RCA、AM1、PDA、LM、OM1和D2)的起点来计算冠状动脉运动速度。给定标志点的速度定义为路径与时间间隔长度的商。记录所选标志点的x、y和z坐标,并通过特定方程用于计算冠状动脉运动的三维路径。通过重复测量方差分析评估速度差异;Bonferroni事后检验用于多个两两比较。在21例患者中测量了1488个标志点(12个收缩期时间点的6个位置)并进行了分析。分别计算每个心率组(即<65;65-80;和>80 bpm)的最小速度平均值。每个节段的平均最低冠状动脉速度出现在采集收缩期每个时间间隔的中期,即280-340 ms。除了<65和>80 bpm之间的AM1分支(p = 0.00495)以及65-80与>80 bpm的心率之间(p = 0.006),三个心率组之间的最小冠状动脉速度没有差异。在R波后200-420 ms的绝对延迟期间,理想的重建间隔在冠状动脉节段之间有显著差异。速度在280至340 ms之间降低。因此,应该采集一个较窄的收缩期间隔范围,而不是单个阶段。