Kuiken Nicoline S S, Rings Edmond H H M, Havinga Rick, Groen Albert K, Tissing Wim J E
Department of Pediatric Oncology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1357-64. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2911-6. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
Patients suffering from gastrointestinal mucositis often receive parenteral nutrition as nutritional support. However, the absence of enteral nutrition might not be beneficial for the intestine. We aimed to determine the feasibility of minimal enteral feeding (MEF) administration in a methotrexate (MTX)-induced mucositis rat model and thereby determine the effect of MEF on recovery.
Male Wistar rats were attached to swivel systems from day 1 to 5 after 45 mg/kg MTX IV injection. The MTX group continued ad libitum feeding, and the MTX + MEF group continued ad libitum feeding and received from day 1 to 5 continuously MEF. MEF consisted of 20% of their normal caloric intake. We measured body weight, intake, and plasma citrulline. At day 10, the rats were terminated and villus and crypt length were measured.
The administration of MEF caused no increased severity of mucositis phenotype, with comparable caloric intake, body weight, and plasma citrulline during mucositis. The recovery of plasma citrulline levels was not different between both groups. At day 7 and 8, the MTX + MEF group gained significantly more weight (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), and at day 8 and 9 the total caloric intake was significantly increased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) compared to the MTX group. At day 10, the rats from the MTX + MEF group showed a significant increase in jejunal villus length compared to the MTX group (p < 0.05).
This is the first study in which the feasibility of MEF administration during chemotherapy-induced mucositis was determined. This study indicates that MEF administration is feasible during mucositis and suggests that MEF accelerates recovery after MTX-induced mucositis.
患有胃肠道黏膜炎的患者常接受肠外营养作为营养支持。然而,缺乏肠内营养可能对肠道并无益处。我们旨在确定在甲氨蝶呤(MTX)诱导的黏膜炎大鼠模型中进行微量肠内喂养(MEF)的可行性,并由此确定MEF对恢复的影响。
雄性Wistar大鼠在静脉注射45mg/kg MTX后的第1天至第5天连接到旋转系统。MTX组继续随意进食,MTX + MEF组继续随意进食,并从第1天至第5天持续接受MEF。MEF为其正常热量摄入的20%。我们测量了体重、摄入量和血浆瓜氨酸。在第10天,处死大鼠并测量绒毛和隐窝长度。
MEF的给予并未导致黏膜炎表型严重程度增加,在黏膜炎期间热量摄入、体重和血浆瓜氨酸水平相当。两组间血浆瓜氨酸水平的恢复无差异。在第7天和第8天,MTX + MEF组体重增加显著更多(分别为p < 0.05和p < 0.01),与MTX组相比,在第8天和第9天总热量摄入显著增加(分别为p < 0.01和p < 0.05)。在第10天,与MTX组相比,MTX + MEF组大鼠空肠绒毛长度显著增加(p < 0.05)。
这是第一项确定化疗诱导的黏膜炎期间给予MEF可行性的研究。该研究表明MEF在黏膜炎期间给予是可行的,并提示MEF可加速MTX诱导的黏膜炎后的恢复。