Mendhiratta Neil, Meng Xiaosong, Rosenkrantz Andrew B, Wysock James S, Fenstermaker Michael, Huang Richard, Deng Fang-Ming, Melamed Jonathan, Zhou Ming, Huang William C, Lepor Herbert, Taneja Samir S
School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
Urology. 2015 Dec;86(6):1192-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.07.038. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
To report outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy (MRF-TB) and 12-core systematic biopsy (SB) over a 26-month period in men with prior negative prostate biopsy.
Between June 2012 and August 2014, 210 men presenting to our institution for prostate biopsy with ≥1 prior negative biopsy underwent multiparametric MRI followed by MRF-TB and SB and were entered into a prospective database. Clinical characteristics, maximum mpMRI suspicion scores (mSS), and biopsy results were queried from the database, and the detection rates of Gleason ≥7 prostate cancer (PCa) and overall PCa were compared between biopsy techniques using McNemar's test.
Forty seven (29%) of 161 men meeting inclusion criteria (mean age, 65 ± 8 years; mean prostate-specific antigen, 8.9 ± 8.9) were found to have PCa. MRF-TB and SB had overall cancer detection rates (CDRs) of 21.7% and 18.6% (P = .36), respectively, and CDR for Gleason score (GS) ≥7 disease of 14.9% and 9.3% (P = .02), respectively. Of 26 men with GS ≥7 disease, MRF-TB detected 24 (92.3%) whereas SB detected 15 (57.7%; P < .01). Using UCSF-CAPRA criteria, only 1 man was restratified from low risk to higher risk based on SB results compared to MRF-TB alone. Among men with mSS <4, 72% of detected cancers were low risk by UCSF-CAPRA criteria.
In men with previous negative biopsies and persistent suspicion of PCa, SB contributes little to the detection of GS ≥7 disease by MRF-TB, and avoidance of SB bears consideration. Based on the low likelihood of detecting GS ≥7 cancer and overall low-risk features of PCa in men with mSS <4, limiting biopsy to men with mSS ≥4 warrants further investigation.
报告在26个月期间,对既往前列腺活检结果为阴性的男性患者进行磁共振成像(MRI)-超声融合靶向活检(MRF-TB)和12针系统活检(SB)的结果。
2012年6月至2014年8月期间,210名因前列腺活检前来我院就诊且既往至少有1次活检结果为阴性的男性患者接受了多参数MRI检查,随后进行了MRF-TB和SB,并被纳入前瞻性数据库。从数据库中查询临床特征、最大多参数MRI可疑评分(mSS)和活检结果,使用McNemar检验比较两种活检技术对Gleason≥7前列腺癌(PCa)和总体PCa的检出率。
161名符合纳入标准的男性患者(平均年龄65±8岁;平均前列腺特异性抗原8.9±8.9)中,47名(29%)被发现患有PCa。MRF-TB和SB的总体癌症检出率(CDR)分别为21.7%和18.6%(P = 0.36),Gleason评分(GS)≥7疾病的CDR分别为14.9%和9.3%(P = 0.02)。在26名GS≥7疾病的男性患者中,MRF-TB检测出24名(92.3%),而SB检测出15名(57.7%;P < 0.01)。根据加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)-癌症风险评估(CAPRA)标准,与单独的MRF-TB相比,仅1名男性患者根据SB结果从低风险重新分类为高风险。在mSS<4的男性患者中,根据UCSF-CAPRA标准,72%检测出的癌症为低风险。
对于既往活检结果为阴性且持续怀疑患有PCa的男性患者,SB对MRF-TB检测GS≥7疾病的贡献不大,是否避免进行SB值得考虑。鉴于mSS<4的男性患者中检测出GS≥7癌症的可能性较低且PCa总体具有低风险特征,将活检限于mSS≥4的男性患者值得进一步研究。