Suppr超能文献

当代临床实践中的前列腺重复活检模式。

Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice.

机构信息

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.084. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in men with a previous negative biopsy and 2) identify predictors of prostate cancer diagnosis on repeat biopsy in these men.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From a university faculty group practice we identified 1,837 men who underwent prostate biopsy between January 1, 1995 and January 1, 2010. Characteristics of repeat biopsy were examined, including the indication for biopsy, the number of repeat biopsies performed, the number of cores obtained and total prostate specific antigen before biopsy. Features of prostate cancer diagnosed on repeat biopsy were examined, including Gleason score, number of positive cores, percent of tumor and treatment choice. Multivariable logistic regression was done to identify prostate cancer predictors.

RESULTS

Initial biopsy was negative in 1,213 men. In 255 men a total of 798 repeat biopsies were performed. Of the 63 men diagnosed with prostate cancer Gleason score was 6 or less in 33 (52%), 7 in 22 (35%) and 8-9 in 8 (13%). When categorized by Epstein criteria, the rate of clinically insignificant cancer diagnosis decreased substantially by the third and fourth repeat biopsies. Repeat biopsy in men older than 70 years, biopsies including more than 20 cores and the fourth repeat biopsy were associated with an increased likelihood of prostate cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In men selected for multiple repeat biopsies clinically significant cancer is found at each sampling round. Given the continued likelihood of cancer detection even by the fifth biopsy, early consideration of saturation or image guided biopsy may be warranted in the repeat biopsy population.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:1)描述既往阴性前列腺活检后重复前列腺活检的模式;2)确定这些男性重复活检中前列腺癌诊断的预测因素。

材料与方法

我们从大学附属医院的医生群体中,选择了 1837 名男性,他们在 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 1 月 1 日期间接受了前列腺活检。我们检查了重复活检的特征,包括活检的指征、进行的重复活检次数、获得的核心数量和活检前前列腺特异性抗原。还检查了在重复活检中诊断为前列腺癌的特征,包括 Gleason 评分、阳性核心数量、肿瘤百分比和治疗选择。采用多变量逻辑回归确定前列腺癌的预测因素。

结果

初始活检在 1213 名男性中为阴性。在 255 名男性中,共进行了 798 次重复活检。在 63 名诊断为前列腺癌的男性中,Gleason 评分为 6 或以下的有 33 名(52%),7 分的有 22 名(35%),8-9 分的有 8 名(13%)。按照 Epstein 标准分类,第三次和第四次重复活检的临床意义不显著的癌症诊断率显著下降。70 岁以上男性、活检包括 20 个以上核心和第四次重复活检与前列腺癌诊断的可能性增加相关。

结论

在选择进行多次重复活检的男性中,在每个采样轮次都能发现具有临床意义的癌症。鉴于即使在第五次活检中仍有可能发现癌症,在重复活检人群中,早期考虑饱和或图像引导活检可能是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验