Cripps Ashley J, Hopper Luke S, Joyce Christopher
School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Notre Dame Australia , Fremantle, Australia.
WA Academy of Performing Arts, Edith Cowan University , Mount Lawley, WA, Australia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2015 Aug 11;14(3):675-80. eCollection 2015 Sep.
Talent identification tests used at the Australian Football League's National Draft Combine assess the capacities of athletes to compete at a professional level. Tests created for the National Draft Combine are also commonly used for talent identification and athlete development in development pathways. The skills tests created by the Australian Football League required players to either handball (striking the ball with the hand) or kick to a series of 6 randomly generated targets. Assessors subjectively rate each skill execution giving a 0-5 score for each disposal. This study aimed to investigate the inter-rater reliability and validity of the skills tests at an adolescent sub-elite level. Male Australian footballers were recruited from sub-elite adolescent teams (n = 121, age = 15.7 ± 0.3 years, height = 1.77 ± 0.07 m, mass = 69.17 ± 8.08 kg). The coaches (n = 7) of each team were also recruited. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Inter-class correlations (ICC) and Limits of Agreement statistics. Both the kicking (ICC = 0.96, p < .01) and handball tests (ICC = 0.89, p < .01) demonstrated strong reliability and acceptable levels of absolute agreement. Content validity was determined by examining the test scores sensitivity to laterality and distance. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing coaches' perceptions of skill to actual test outcomes. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) examined the main effect of laterality, with scores on the dominant hand (p = .04) and foot (p < .01) significantly higher compared to the non-dominant side. Follow-up univariate analysis reported significant differences at every distance in the kicking test. A poor correlation was found between coaches' perceptions of skill and testing outcomes. The results of this study demonstrate both skill tests demonstrate acceptable inter-rater reliable. Partial content validity was confirmed for the kicking test, however further research is required to confirm validity of the handball test. Key pointsThe skill tests created by the AFL demonstrated acceptable levels of relative and absolute inter-rater reliability.Both the AFL's skills tests are able to differentiate between athletes dominant and non-dominant limbs. However, only the kicking test could consistently differentiated between score outcomes over a range of Australian Football specific disposal distances.Both tests demonstrated poor concurrent validity, with no correlation found between coaches' perceptions of technical skills and actual skill outcomes measured.
澳大利亚足球联盟全国选秀综合测试中使用的人才识别测试评估运动员在职业水平上竞争的能力。为全国选秀综合测试创建的测试也常用于发展路径中的人才识别和运动员培养。澳大利亚足球联盟创建的技能测试要求球员要么用手传球(用手击球),要么踢向一系列6个随机生成的目标。评估人员对每个技能执行情况进行主观评分,每次处理给出0 - 5分。本研究旨在调查青少年次精英水平技能测试的评分者间信度和效度。从次精英青少年球队招募了男性澳大利亚足球运动员(n = 121,年龄 = 15.7 ± 0.3岁,身高 = 1.77 ± 0.07米,体重 = 69.17 ± 8.08千克)。还招募了每个球队的教练(n = 7)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和一致性界限统计量评估评分者间信度。踢球测试(ICC = 0.96,p <.01)和手传球测试(ICC = 0.89,p <.01)都显示出很强的信度和可接受的绝对一致性水平。通过检查测试分数对偏侧性和距离的敏感性来确定内容效度。通过比较教练对技能的看法与实际测试结果来评估同时效度。多变量方差分析(MANOVA)研究了偏侧性的主要影响,优势手(p =.04)和脚(p <.01)的得分明显高于非优势侧。后续单变量分析报告了踢球测试中每个距离都存在显著差异。发现教练对技能的看法与测试结果之间相关性较差。本研究结果表明,两种技能测试都显示出可接受的评分者间信度。踢球测试证实了部分内容效度,然而需要进一步研究来确认手传球测试的效度。要点澳大利亚足球联盟创建的技能测试显示出可接受的相对和绝对评分者间信度水平。澳大利亚足球联盟的两种技能测试都能够区分运动员的优势和非优势肢体。然而,只有踢球测试能够在一系列澳大利亚足球特定处理距离上始终区分得分结果。两种测试都显示出较差的同时效度,教练对技术技能的看法与实际测量的技能结果之间没有相关性。