Arias Lopez Maria Pilar, Fernández Ariel L, Ratto María E, Saligari Liliana, Serrate Alejandro Siaba, Ko In Ja, Troster Eduardo, Schnitzler Eduardo
Hospital de Niños Dr Ricardo Gutiérrez, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
FUNDASAMIN (Fundación para la Salud Materno Infantil), CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Crit Care. 2015 Dec;30(6):1324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
The purpose of this study is to asses the performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) score in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Latin America.
This is a prospective, observational, multicenter study. We included patients aged 1 month to 16 years old admitted consecutively during 1 year to 34 PICUs in 9 Latin American countries. Discrimination and calibration tests were performed to validate the performance of PIM2 in the entire sample and in different subgroups.
A total of 7391 patients were analyzed. Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 predicted 573 deaths, whereas the observed deaths were 663 (P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the entire population was 0.817 (95% confidence interval, 0.808-0.825). The score showed good discrimination. Instead, calibration was inadequate. The difference between observed and predicted deaths for the entire population and across different risk intervals was statistically significant (χ(2) = 121.87; df = 8; P < .001). Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 did not predict mortality correctly in different diagnostic categories (injury, postoperative, and miscellaneous), in children younger than 12 months, adolescents, and patients with chronic complex conditions.
Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 showed good discrimination, but calibration was inadequate. To use PIM2 for monitoring PICU performance in Latin America, it might be necessary to recalibrate the score locally.
本研究旨在评估儿童死亡指数2(PIM2)评分在拉丁美洲儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中的表现。
这是一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究。我们纳入了9个拉丁美洲国家34个PICU在1年期间连续收治的1个月至16岁的患者。进行了辨别和校准测试,以验证PIM2在整个样本和不同亚组中的表现。
共分析了7391例患者。儿童死亡指数2预测了573例死亡,而观察到的死亡病例为663例(P <.001)。整个群体的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.817(95%置信区间,0.808 - 0.825)。该评分显示出良好的辨别能力。然而,校准并不充分。整个群体以及不同风险区间观察到的死亡与预测死亡之间的差异具有统计学意义(χ(2)= 121.87;自由度 = 8;P <.001)。儿童死亡指数2在不同诊断类别(损伤、术后和其他)、12个月以下儿童、青少年以及患有慢性复杂疾病的患者中未能正确预测死亡率。
儿童死亡指数2显示出良好的辨别能力,但校准并不充分。要在拉丁美洲使用PIM2来监测PICU的表现,可能有必要在当地重新校准该评分。