Suppr超能文献

儿科适宜性使用标准实施项目:多中心门诊超声心动图质量倡议。

Pediatric Appropriate Use Criteria Implementation Project: A Multicenter Outpatient Echocardiography Quality Initiative.

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Sibley Heart Center Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia.

American College of Cardiology, Washington, DC.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 8;66(10):1132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1327.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently published appropriate use criteria (AUC) for initial pediatric outpatient transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) have not yet been evaluated for clinical applicability.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the appropriateness of TTE as currently performed in pediatric cardiology clinics, diagnostic yield of TTE for various AUC indications, and any gaps in the AUC document.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing initial outpatient TTE in 6 centers. TTE indications (appropriate [A], may be appropriate [M], or rarely appropriate [R]) and findings (normal, incidental, or abnormal) were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 2,655 studies ordered by 102 physicians, indications rated A, M, and R were found in 1,876 (71%), 316 (12%), and 319 studies (12%), respectively, and 144 studies (5%) were unclassifiable. Twenty-four of 113 indications (21%) were not used. Innocent murmur and syncope or palpitations with no other indications of cardiovascular disease, a benign family history, and normal electrocardiogram accounted for 75% of indications rated R. Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%). Odds of an abnormal finding in an A or M TTE were 6 times that of R (95% confidence interval [CI]: [2.8 to 12.8]). Abnormal findings were more common in patients <1 year of age than in those >10 years of age (odds ratio: 6.4; 95% CI: 4.7 to 8.7). Age was a significant predictor of an abnormal finding after adjusting for indication and site (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most TTEs ordered in pediatric cardiology clinics were for indications rated A. AUC ratings successfully stratified indications based on the yield of abnormal findings. This study identified differences in the yield of TTE based on patient age and most common indications rated R. These findings should inform quality improvement efforts and future revisions of the AUC document.

摘要

背景

最近发布的儿童门诊经胸超声心动图(TTE)初始检查的适宜性使用标准(AUC)尚未评估其临床适用性。

目的

本研究旨在确定儿科心脏病学诊所目前进行的 TTE 的适宜性、TTE 对各种 AUC 适应证的诊断效果,以及 AUC 文件中的任何差距。

方法

数据从 6 个中心进行的初始门诊 TTE 患者中前瞻性收集。记录 TTE 适应证(适宜[A]、可能适宜[M]或很少适宜[R])和发现(正常、偶然或异常)。

结果

102 名医生共开了 2655 次 TTE 检查,A、M 和 R 适应证的 TTE 检查分别为 1876 次(71%)、316 次(12%)和 319 次(12%),144 次(5%)不可分类。113 项适应证中有 24 项(21%)未使用。单纯性杂音和无心血管疾病其他症状的晕厥或心悸、良性家族史和正常心电图占 R 适应证的 75%。病理性杂音的异常发现率最高(40%)。A 或 M 级 TTE 检查异常发现的可能性是 R 级的 6 倍(95%置信区间[CI]:[2.8 到 12.8])。<1 岁的患者异常发现的可能性大于>10 岁的患者(比值比:6.4;95%CI:4.7 到 8.7)。在调整适应证和部位后,年龄是异常发现的重要预测因素(p<0.001)。

结论

儿科心脏病学诊所开的大多数 TTE 都是针对 A 级适应证。AUC 分级成功地根据异常发现的发生率对适应证进行分层。本研究根据患者年龄和最常见的 R 级适应证,确定了 TTE 检查的诊断效果差异。这些发现应该为质量改进工作和 AUC 文件的未来修订提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验