Friedenreich Christine M, Neilson Heather K, Wang Qinggang, Stanczyk Frank Z, Yasui Yutaka, Duha Aalo, MacLaughlin Sarah, Kallal Ciara, Forbes Cynthia C, Courneya Kerry S
Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention ResearchCancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, 2210 2nd Street Southwest, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2S 3C3Departments of Oncology and Community Health SciencesCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaKeck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USASchool of Public HealthUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaCross Cancer InstituteCancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaFaculty of Physical Education and RecreationUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention ResearchCancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, 2210 2nd Street Southwest, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2S 3C3Departments of Oncology and Community Health SciencesCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaKeck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USASchool of Public HealthUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaCross Cancer InstituteCancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaFaculty of Physical Education and RecreationUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention ResearchCancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, 2210 2nd Street Southwest, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2S 3C3Departments of Oncology and Community Health SciencesCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaKeck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USASchool of Public HealthUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaCross Cancer InstituteCancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaFaculty of Physical Education and RecreationUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015 Oct;22(5):863-76. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0243.
Exercise dose comparison trials with biomarker outcomes can identify the amount of exercise required to reduce breast cancer risk and also strengthen the causal inference between physical activity and breast cancer. The Breast Cancer and Exercise Trial in Alberta (BETA) tested whether or not greater changes in estradiol (E2), estrone, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations can be achieved in postmenopausal women randomized to 12 months of HIGH (300 min/week) vs MODERATE (150 min/week) volumes of aerobic exercise. BETA included 400 inactive postmenopausal women aged 50-74 years with BMI of 22-40 kg/m(2). Blood was drawn at baseline and 6 and 12 months. Adiposity, physical fitness, diet, and total physical activity were assessed at baseline and 12 months. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed using linear mixed models. At full prescription, women exercised more in the HIGH vs MODERATE group (median min/week (quartiles 1,3): 253 (157 289) vs 137 (111 150); P<0.0001). Twelve-month changes in estrogens and SHBG were <10% on average for both groups. No group differences were found for E2, estrone, SHBG or free E2 changes (treatment effect ratios (95% CI) from linear mixed models: 1.00 (0.96-1.06), 1.02 (0.98-1.05), 0.99 (0.96-1.02), 1.01 (0.95, 1.06), respectively, representing the HIGH:MODERATE ratio of geometric mean biomarker levels over 12 months; n=382). In per-protocol analyses, borderline significantly greater decreases in total and free E2 occurred in the HIGH group. Overall, no dose effect was observed for women randomized to 300 vs 150 min/week of moderate to vigorous intensity exercise who actually performed a median of 253 vs 137 min/week. For total and free E2, the lack of differential effect may be due to modest adherence in the higher dose group.
采用生物标志物结果的运动剂量比较试验可以确定降低乳腺癌风险所需的运动量,还能加强体力活动与乳腺癌之间的因果推断。艾伯塔省乳腺癌与运动试验(BETA)测试了随机分配到12个月高强度(300分钟/周)与中等强度(150分钟/周)有氧运动的绝经后女性,其雌二醇(E2)、雌酮和性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)浓度是否能有更大变化。BETA纳入了400名年龄在50 - 74岁、BMI为22 - 40kg/m²的不活动绝经后女性。在基线、6个月和12个月时采集血液样本。在基线和12个月时评估肥胖、体能、饮食和总体体力活动情况。使用线性混合模型进行意向性分析。在完全按处方执行时,高强度组女性的运动量高于中等强度组(每周分钟数中位数(四分位数1,3):253(157 - 289)对137(111 - 150);P<0.0001)。两组雌激素和SHBG的12个月变化平均均<10%。在E2、雌酮、SHBG或游离E2变化方面未发现组间差异(线性混合模型的治疗效果比(95%CI)分别为:1.00(0.96 - 1.06)、1.02(0.98 - 1.05)、0.99(0.96 - 1.02)、1.01(0.95, 1.06),代表12个月内几何平均生物标志物水平的高强度:中等强度比值;n = 382)。在符合方案分析中,高强度组总E2和游离E2的下降幅度有临界显著差异。总体而言,对于随机分配到每周300分钟与150分钟中等至高强度运动且实际每周运动量中位数为253分钟与137分钟的女性,未观察到剂量效应。对于总E2和游离E2,缺乏差异效应可能是由于高剂量组的依从性一般。