Birditt Kira S, Hartnett Caroline Sten, Fingerman Karen L, Zarit Steven, Antonucci Toni C
Life Course Development Program, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48104.
Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, 911 Pickens St, Sloan College, No. 321, Columbia, SC 29208.
J Marriage Fam. 2015 Jul;77(4):877-888. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12203.
The intergenerational stake hypothesis suggests that parents are more invested in their children and experience better quality parent-child ties than do their children. In this study the authors examined variation in reports of relationship quality regarding parents and children intraindividually (do people report better quality ties with their children than with their parents?) and whether within-person variations have implications for well-being. Participants age 40-60 (N = 633) reported on their relationship quality (importance, positive and negative quality) with their parents and adult children. Individuals reported their relationships with children were more important and more negative than relationships with parents. Individuals with feelings that were in the opposite direction of the intergenerational stake hypothesis (i.e., greater investment in parents than children) reported poorer well-being. The findings provide support for the intergenerational stake hypothesis with regard to within-person variations in investment and show that negative relationship quality may coincide with greater feelings of investment.
代际利益假说表明,与子女相比,父母对子女投入更多,且体验到的亲子关系质量更高。在本研究中,作者考察了个体内部关于父母和子女关系质量报告的差异(人们与子女的关系质量是否比与父母的关系质量更好?)以及个体内部差异是否对幸福感有影响。年龄在40至60岁之间的参与者(N = 633)报告了他们与父母及成年子女的关系质量(重要性、积极和消极质量)。个体报告称,他们与子女的关系比与父母的关系更重要且更消极。与代际利益假说方向相反(即对父母的投入大于对子女的投入)的个体报告的幸福感较差。研究结果为代际利益假说中关于个体内部投入差异提供了支持,并表明消极的关系质量可能与更强的投入感同时出现。