• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高基层医疗中的用药安全。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全合作组织的一项综述与共识程序。

Improving medication safety in primary care. A review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.

作者信息

Lainer Miriam, Vögele Anna, Wensing Michel, Sönnichsen Andreas

机构信息

a Paracelsus Medical University, Institute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine , Salzburg , Austria.

出版信息

Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):14-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043124.

DOI:10.3109/13814788.2015.1043124
PMID:26339830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4828608/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug treatment is an important clinical process in primary care that is associated with risk of error and adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

To review currently available research evidence on the topic and to develop a framework, which can help to guide improvement of medication safety.

METHODS

Systematic reviews were performed on adverse drug events (ADE), their preventability, and on available tools and methods to improve medication safety with a particular focus on information technology. Consensus methods were used to develop a framework to guide the improvement of medication safety based on the findings of our literature review.

RESULTS

The median prevalence rate of ADEs in primary care patients was 12.8%. Only a median of 16.5% of ADEs were preventable and thus could be classified as medication errors. Our review of information technology interventions found that only about half of the studies found a reduction of medication errors. In both reviews, the wide range between studies emphasizes the necessity of a validated medication error classification system. Another important aspect of medication safety appears to be a general lack of safety culture in primary care, which led us to the development of the Salzburg medication safety framework (SaMSaF), based on the MaPSaF tool to improve patient safety. The tool proved to be feasible and useful in a pilot study with several GP practices.

CONCLUSION

A number of tools and interventions to investigate and enhance medication safety have been identified. Further research is necessary to implement and evaluate current concepts.

摘要

背景

药物治疗是基层医疗中的一个重要临床过程,与差错和不良事件风险相关。

目的

回顾关于该主题的现有研究证据,并制定一个有助于指导提高用药安全性的框架。

方法

对药物不良事件(ADE)、其可预防性以及用于提高用药安全性的现有工具和方法进行系统评价,特别关注信息技术。采用共识方法,根据我们文献综述的结果制定一个指导提高用药安全性的框架。

结果

基层医疗患者中ADE的中位患病率为12.8%。只有中位16.5%的ADE是可预防的,因此可归类为用药差错。我们对信息技术干预措施的综述发现,只有约一半的研究发现用药差错有所减少。在这两项综述中,研究之间的广泛差异强调了一个经过验证的用药差错分类系统的必要性。用药安全的另一个重要方面似乎是基层医疗中普遍缺乏安全文化,这促使我们在MaPSaF工具的基础上开发了萨尔茨堡用药安全框架(SaMSaF),以提高患者安全。该工具在对多个全科医生诊所进行的试点研究中被证明是可行且有用的。

结论

已确定了一些用于调查和提高用药安全性的工具和干预措施。有必要进行进一步研究以实施和评估当前的概念。

相似文献

1
Improving medication safety in primary care. A review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.提高基层医疗中的用药安全。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全合作组织的一项综述与共识程序。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):14-8. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043124.
2
Information technology interventions to improve medication safety in primary care: a systematic review.信息技术干预措施以提高初级保健中的药物安全:系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Oct;25(5):590-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt043. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
3
Quality and safety of medication use in primary care: consensus validation of a new set of explicit medication assessment criteria and prioritisation of topics for improvement.基层医疗中药物使用的质量与安全:一套新的明确药物评估标准的共识验证及改进主题的优先级确定
BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Feb 8;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6904-12-5.
4
Improving drug safety in hospitals: a retrospective study on the potential of adverse drug events coded in routine data.提高医院药物安全性:基于常规数据中编码的药物不良事件的潜在风险的回顾性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 8;19(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4381-x.
5
A research agenda on patient safety in primary care. Recommendations by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.一份关于基层医疗中患者安全的研究议程。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全合作组织的建议。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):72-7. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043726.
6
Comprehensive Literature Review of Factors Influencing Medication Safety in Nursing Homes: Using a Systems Model.综合文献回顾:影响养老院用药安全的因素:使用系统模型。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):470-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.069. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
7
Impact of medication reconciliation for improving transitions of care.药物重整对改善医疗转接的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):CD010791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010791.pub2.
8
Medication safety programs in primary care: a scoping review.基层医疗中的用药安全项目:一项范围综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Oct;15(10):2512-2526. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003436.
9
Characterising the complexity of medication safety using a human factors approach: an observational study in two intensive care units.采用人因工程学方法描述药物安全的复杂性:在两个重症监护病房的观察性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan;23(1):56-65. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001828. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care teams' reported actions to improve medication safety: a qualitative study with insights in high reliability organising.基层医疗团队改善用药安全的报告行动:一项具有高可靠性组织见解的定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Sep;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002350.
2
Safe Medication in Nursing Home Residents Through the Development and Evaluation of an Intervention (SAME): Protocol for a Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Study With a Cocreative Approach.通过干预措施的开发与评估实现疗养院居民安全用药(SAME):一项采用共同创造方法的完全整合混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 31;12:e43538. doi: 10.2196/43538.
3
Ambulatory Medication Safety in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement tools and process indicators of patient safety culture in primary care. A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.基层医疗中患者安全文化的测量工具与过程指标。LINNEAUS基层医疗患者安全合作项目的一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):26-30. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043732.
2
Validity of and interrater agreement on the LINNEAUS Euro-PC medication safety incident classification system in primary care in Poland.LINNEAUS欧洲初级保健用药安全事件分类系统在波兰初级保健中的有效性及评估者间一致性
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Aug;20(4):369-74. doi: 10.1111/jep.12138. Epub 2014 May 5.
3
初级医疗中的门诊用药安全:系统评价。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 May-Jun;35(3):610-628. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.03.210334.
4
General practitioners' attitude towards cooperation with other health professionals in managing patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: A cross-sectional study.全科医生在管理患有多种疾病和多种药物治疗的患者方面与其他卫生专业人员合作的态度:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2022 Dec;28(1):109-117. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2044781.
5
Improving patient self-reporting of antihypertensive adverse drug events in primary care: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial.提高初级保健中抗高血压药物不良反应的患者自我报告率:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Aug 7;22(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01478-w.
6
Prevalence of adverse drug reactions in the primary care setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基层医疗环境中药物不良反应的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0252161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252161. eCollection 2021.
7
Patient and provider perspectives on reducing risk of harm in primary health care: a qualitative questionnaire study in Sweden.患者和医务人员对减少初级卫生保健中伤害风险的看法:瑞典的一项定性问卷调查研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;38(1):66-74. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1717095. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
8
Pharmacy Education Needs to Address Diagnostic Safety.药学教育需要解决诊断安全问题。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):7442. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7442.
9
Drivers and strategies for avoiding overuse. A cross-sectional study to explore the experience of Spanish primary care providers handling uncertainty and patients' requests.避免过度医疗的驱动因素和策略。一项横断面研究,旨在探索西班牙初级保健提供者处理不确定性和患者需求的经验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e021339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021339.
10
Developing a research agenda for patient safety in primary care. Background, aims and output of the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.制定基层医疗中患者安全的研究议程。基层医疗患者安全LINNEAUS合作项目的背景、目标及成果
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):3-7. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043122.
Information technology interventions to improve medication safety in primary care: a systematic review.
信息技术干预措施以提高初级保健中的药物安全:系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Oct;25(5):590-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt043. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
4
Frequency of medication errors in primary care patients with polypharmacy.[原文] 药物错误在 [药物种类] 较多的初级保健患者中的发生频率。
Fam Pract. 2013 Jun;30(3):313-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms070. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
5
A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.药剂师主导的信息技术干预药物错误(PINCER):一项多中心、集群随机对照试验和成本效益分析。
Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1310-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61817-5. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
6
Prevalence of adverse drug events in ambulatory care: a systematic review.门诊护理中药物不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Jul;45(7-8):977-89. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P627. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
7
Patient safety culture in primary care: developing a theoretical framework for practical use.基层医疗中的患者安全文化:构建一个供实际应用的理论框架。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):313-20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018366.
8
Reliability evaluation of the adapted national coordinating council medication error reporting and prevention (NCC MERP) index.改编后的国家协调委员会用药错误报告与预防(NCC MERP)指数的可靠性评估。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Sep;16(9):1006-13. doi: 10.1002/pds.1423.
9
Evaluation of outpatient computerized physician medication order entry systems: a systematic review.门诊医生计算机医嘱录入系统的评估:一项系统综述
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):400-6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2238. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
10
Safety culture assessment in community pharmacy: development, face validity, and feasibility of the Manchester Patient Safety Assessment Framework.社区药房的安全文化评估:曼彻斯特患者安全评估框架的开发、表面效度和可行性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):417-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014332.