Suppr超能文献

减重手术后脓肿的经腔或经皮内镜引流及清创术:病例系列

Transluminal or Percutaneous Endoscopic Drainage and Debridement of Abscesses After Bariatric Surgery: a Case Series.

作者信息

Lemmers Arnaud, Tan Damien My, Ibrahim Mostafa, Loi Patrizia, De Backer Daniel, Closset Jean, Devière Jacques, Le Moine Olivier

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, ULB (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Erasme Hospital, 808 route de Lennik, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Abdominal Surgery, ULB (Université Libre de Bruxelles), Erasme Hospital, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2015 Nov;25(11):2190-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1854-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Since redo surgery is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery in case of leakage, we sought to evaluate whether endoscopic drainage and debridement of collections following bariatric surgery is an efficient step-up approach to the management of these complications.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2011, we retrospectively studied our cohort of nine cases treated by endoscopic drainage and debridement of abdominal abscesses secondary to postbariatric surgery leaks performed via the transluminal or percutaneous route.

RESULTS

Three patients were treated by percutaneous endoscopic debridement of abscesses knowing that their leak was already closed by other endoscopic means and that their collection did not improve despite external drain in place. Six patients were treated by transluminal endoscopic drainage to perform necrosectomy as a first-line option or after failure of improvement after endoscopic treatment. The number of sessions required ranged from 1 to 3. Most severe patients had rapid improvement of their hemodynamic and respiratory conditions. In eight of the nine patients, we were able to close the fistula by stent, fistula plugs, or a macroclip. Resolution of collections was seen in seven out of nine patients, but two required further surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic necrosectomy via the transluminal or percutaneous route is a feasible option in postbariatric surgery patients with necrotic abscesses not adequately managed by the classical combination of percutaneous drainage and stenting. Further wide-scale studies are needed to compare this non-surgical method with surgical necrosectomy in postbariatric surgery patients.

摘要

背景与目的

由于减重手术后再次手术若发生渗漏会伴有较高的发病和死亡风险,我们试图评估减重手术后内镜下引流及清除积液是否是处理这些并发症的一种有效的递进式方法。

方法

2007年至2011年,我们回顾性研究了一组9例患者,这些患者均接受了经腔内或经皮途径的内镜下引流及清除因减重手术后渗漏继发的腹部脓肿治疗。

结果

3例患者在已知其渗漏已通过其他内镜方法封闭且尽管已放置外部引流但积液仍未改善的情况下,接受了经皮内镜下脓肿清创术。6例患者接受了经腔内内镜引流,以作为一线选择进行坏死组织清除术,或在内镜治疗后改善失败时进行该操作。所需的治疗次数为1至3次。大多数病情严重的患者其血流动力学和呼吸状况迅速改善。9例患者中有8例,我们能够通过支架、瘘管封堵器或大夹子封闭瘘管。9例患者中有7例积液得到消退,但2例需要进一步手术。

结论

对于经皮引流和支架置入的传统联合治疗无法充分处理坏死性脓肿的减重手术后患者,经腔内或经皮途径进行内镜下坏死组织清除术是一种可行的选择。需要进一步开展大规模研究,以比较这种非手术方法与减重手术后患者手术坏死组织清除术的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验