Robinson Jana
18 West Flagge Street, Rockaway, NJ 07866, United States.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Sep-Dec;42-43:168-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Sep 4.
The increasing presence of child witnesses in the courtroom has brought with it a host of challenges and dilemmas. Related concerns include whether children may be deemed incompetent solely because of their age, whether their testimony is reliable and accurate in light of their allegedly suggestible nature, and whether the experience of testifying may re-traumatize witnesses who are also victims. A growing body of multidisciplinary research continues to address the legal and clinical implications of permitting children to testify in open court. Numerous guidelines have been promulgated that contain recommendations for protecting children's best interests as they journey through the criminal justice system. Related courtroom procedures vary greatly among American jurisdictions, and innovations in other countries--for example, the United Kingdom's Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act of 1999, and similar legislation in Israel and in Norway--have introduced a range of alternative measures that can be employed with young witnesses, depending primarily on whether the child witness is ultimately deemed either "vulnerable" or "intimidated." This article incorporates legal and psychological studies--from geographically diverse perspectives--that focus upon the courtroom experiences of child witnesses in criminal proceedings, including determinations of testimonial capacity and other matters unique to this population.
法庭上儿童证人越来越多,随之带来了一系列挑战和困境。相关问题包括,儿童是否仅因其年龄就可能被视为无行为能力,鉴于其据称易受暗示的天性,他们的证词是否可靠准确,以及作证经历是否会再次伤害那些同时也是受害者的证人。越来越多的多学科研究继续探讨允许儿童在公开法庭上作证的法律和临床意义。已经颁布了许多指导方针,其中包含在儿童经历刑事司法系统过程中保护其最大利益的建议。美国各司法管辖区的相关法庭程序差异很大,其他国家的创新举措——例如英国1999年的《青少年司法和刑事证据法》,以及以色列和挪威的类似立法——已经引入了一系列可供年轻证人使用的替代措施,主要取决于儿童证人最终被视为“易受伤害”还是“受到恐吓”。本文纳入了来自不同地域视角的法律和心理学研究,这些研究关注刑事诉讼中儿童证人的法庭经历,包括对作证能力的判定以及该群体特有的其他事项。