• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面对面交锋:闭路电视技术对儿童目击证人证词及陪审员裁决的影响

Face-to-face confrontation: effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions.

作者信息

Goodman G S, Tobey A E, Batterman-Faunce J M, Orcutt H, Thomas S, Shapiro C, Sachsenmaier T

机构信息

University of California, Davis, USA.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 1998 Apr;22(2):165-203. doi: 10.1023/a:1025742119977.

DOI:10.1023/a:1025742119977
PMID:9566121
Abstract

The present study was designed to examine effects of closed-circuit technology on children's testimony and jurors' perceptions of child witnesses. For the study, a series of elaborately staged mock trials was held. First, 5- to 6-year-old and 8- to 9-year-old children individually participated in a play session with an unfamiliar male confederate. Approximately 2 weeks later, children individually testified about the event at downtown city courtroom. Mock juries composed of community recruits viewed the trials, with the child's testimony presented either live in open court or over closed-circuit television. Mock jurors made ratings concerning the child witness and the defendant, and deliberated to reach a verdict. Results indicated that overall, older children were more accurate witnesses than younger children. However, older, not younger children produced more inaccurate information in free recall. Compared to live testimony in open court, use of closed-circuit technology led to decreased suggestibility for younger children. Testifying in open court was also associated with children experiencing greater pretrial anxiety. Closed-circuit technology did not diminish fact finders' abilities to discriminate accurate from inaccurate child testimony, nor did it directly bias jurors against the defendant. However, closed-circuit testimony biased jurors against child witnesses. Moreover, jurors tended to base their impressions of witness credibility on perceived confidence and consistency. Implications for the use of closed-circuit technology when children testify are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在考察闭路电视技术对儿童证词以及陪审员对儿童证人看法的影响。在该研究中,进行了一系列精心编排的模拟审判。首先,5至6岁以及8至9岁的儿童分别与一名陌生的男性同谋参与一场游戏环节。大约两周后,儿童在市中心的城市法庭就该事件进行单独作证。由社区招募人员组成的模拟陪审团观看审判,儿童的证词通过在公开法庭上现场呈现或通过闭路电视播放。模拟陪审员对儿童证人和被告进行评分,并进行审议以达成裁决。结果表明,总体而言,年龄较大的儿童比年龄较小的儿童是更准确的证人。然而,年龄较大而非较小的儿童在自由回忆中产生了更多不准确的信息。与在公开法庭上的现场证词相比,闭路电视技术的使用降低了年幼儿童的易受暗示性。在公开法庭作证也与儿童在审前经历更大的焦虑有关。闭路电视技术并没有削弱事实认定者区分儿童准确与不准确证词的能力,也没有直接使陪审员对被告产生偏见。然而,闭路电视证词使陪审员对儿童证人产生偏见。此外,陪审员倾向于根据感知到的自信和一致性来形成对证人可信度的印象。文中讨论了儿童作证时使用闭路电视技术的影响。

相似文献

1
Face-to-face confrontation: effects of closed-circuit technology on children's eyewitness testimony and jurors' decisions.面对面交锋:闭路电视技术对儿童目击证人证词及陪审员裁决的影响
Law Hum Behav. 1998 Apr;22(2):165-203. doi: 10.1023/a:1025742119977.
2
Detecting deception in children's testimony: factfinders' abilities to reach the truth in open court and closed-circuit trials.检测儿童证词中的欺骗行为:事实认定者在公开法庭和闭路审判中查明真相的能力。
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Aug;25(4):339-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1010603618330.
3
Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.传闻证据与儿童证言:真实陈述和虚假陈述对陪审员决策的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Jun;30(3):363-401. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9009-0.
4
Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.保持偏见:与具有不同偏见的他人协商如何影响模拟陪审员的有罪判决、对被告的看法、记忆和证据解释。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;41(5):478-493. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000256. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
5
When a Battered Victim Kills Their Abuser: The Impact of Child and Expert Testimony on Mock Jurors' Decision-Making.当受虐受害者杀害施虐者时:儿童及专家证词对模拟陪审员决策的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2025 Sep;40(17-18):4010-4032. doi: 10.1177/08862605241284662. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
6
Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?专家证言在儿童证人案件中的作用:其是否能使陪审员更加关注法医访谈质量?
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Apr;35(2):152-64. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9228-2.
7
Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.律师质疑对符合陪审团资格的成年人对律师、儿童证人及被告有罪的评估。
Behav Sci Law. 2016 Jan;34(1):178-99. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2214. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
8
Do Jurors Get What They Expect? Traditional versus Alternative Forms of Children's Testimony.陪审员得到他们所期望的了吗?儿童证词的传统形式与替代形式。
Psychol Crime Law. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):27-47. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.613391. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
9
Perceptions of bias and credibility of male and female clinical psychologist and psychiatrist expert witnesses presenting clinical information in the courtroom.在法庭上呈现临床信息时,男性和女性临床心理学家和精神科医生专家证人的偏见和可信度认知。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2024 Sep-Oct;96:102016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102016. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
10
Mock Juror Perceptions of Eyewitness Reports Given by Children with Intellectual Disabilities.模拟陪审员对智障儿童给出的目击证人报告的看法。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Sep 26. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06561-6.

引用本文的文献

1
CHILD WITNESSES AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE.儿童证人与对质条款。
J Crim Law Criminol. 2012;102(4):1181-1232.
2
SUPPORTING CHILDREN IN U.S. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS: Descriptive and Attitudinal Data From a National Survey of Victim/Witness Assistants.在美国法律程序中支持儿童:来自全国受害者/证人助理调查的描述性和态度性数据。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2013;19(1):98-113. doi: 10.1037/a0027879.
3
Beliefs and expectancies in legal decision making: an introduction to the Special Issue.法律决策中的信念与预期:特刊引言
Psychol Crime Law. 2012;18(1). doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.641557.
4
Assessing children's competency to take the oath in court: The influence of question type on children's accuracy.评估儿童在法庭宣誓的能力:问题类型对儿童准确性的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Jun;36(3):195-205. doi: 10.1037/h0093957.
5
Do Jurors Get What They Expect? Traditional versus Alternative Forms of Children's Testimony.陪审员得到他们所期望的了吗?儿童证词的传统形式与替代形式。
Psychol Crime Law. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):27-47. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.613391. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
6
Promising to tell the truth makes 8- to 16-year-olds more honest.承诺说实话会使 8 到 16 岁的孩子更诚实。
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Nov-Dec;28(6):801-11. doi: 10.1002/bsl.960. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
7
Visual evidence.视觉证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Apr;17(2):149-54. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.149.
8
Gaze aversion: a response to cognitive or social difficulty?目光回避:对认知或社交困难的一种反应?
Mem Cognit. 2005 Jun;33(4):727-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03195338.