Kasdorf Ericalyn, Grunebaum Amos, Perlman Jeffrey M
Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Nov;53(5):417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
This study aims to categorize infants treated with therapeutic hypothermia who presented with suspected subacute hypoxia-ischemia-that is, injury that likely occurred well before delivery and thus beyond the 6-hour window for therapeutic hypothermia-and to contrast the clinical characteristics with infants who suffered a known acute hypoxia-ischemia event.
A retrospective chart review was undertaken of infants treated with therapeutic hypothermia at our center during a 6-year period. Suspected subacute injury is defined as decreased fetal movement greater than 6 hours before delivery or severe depression at birth without need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acute injury is defined as an acute perinatal event including placental abruption, ruptured uterus, or umbilical cord abnormalities. Abnormal outcome is defined as death, cognitive delay, or spastic quadriplegia at follow-up.
Infants with subacute (n = 7) versus acute injury (n = 26) were less likely to require cardiopulmonary resuscitation, were less acidotic at birth on cord gases with no significant difference in initial postnatal pH or base deficit, were more severely encephalopathic with severe amplitude electroencephalogram suppression, and demonstrated universal adverse outcome.
These data demonstrate greater benefit of therapeutic hypothermia for those infants with acute versus subacute injury. Early initiation of therapeutic hypothermia relative to the presumed onset of hypoxia-ischemia is critical. Early severe encephalopathy in the absence of a known acute perinatal event should raise concern in some cases for a subacute insult where the effect of therapeutic hypothermia is unlikely to be of benefit.
本研究旨在对接受亚低温治疗的疑似亚急性缺氧缺血性损伤的婴儿进行分类,即可能在分娩前很久就已发生的损伤,因此超出了亚低温治疗的6小时时间窗,并将这些婴儿的临床特征与已知发生急性缺氧缺血事件的婴儿进行对比。
对我们中心在6年期间接受亚低温治疗的婴儿进行回顾性病历审查。疑似亚急性损伤定义为分娩前6小时以上胎动减少或出生时严重抑制但无需心肺复苏。急性损伤定义为急性围产期事件,包括胎盘早剥、子宫破裂或脐带异常。不良结局定义为随访时死亡、认知延迟或痉挛性四肢瘫。
与急性损伤婴儿(n = 26)相比,亚急性损伤婴儿(n = 7)需要心肺复苏的可能性较小,出生时脐血气酸中毒程度较轻,出生后初始pH值或碱缺失无显著差异,脑病更严重,脑电图有严重波幅抑制,并均显示不良结局。
这些数据表明,亚低温治疗对急性损伤婴儿比对亚急性损伤婴儿更有益。相对于推测的缺氧缺血发作尽早开始亚低温治疗至关重要。在没有已知急性围产期事件的情况下,早期严重脑病在某些情况下应引起对亚急性损伤的关注,而亚低温治疗对此不太可能有益。