Mc Allister Eugenia, Pacheco-Lopez Gustavo, Woods Stephen C, Langhans Wolfgang
Physiology and Behavior Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland.
Physiology and Behavior Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland; Health Sciences Department, Metropolitan University (UAM) at Lerma, Mexico; Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 1;151:623-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.08.038. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
Insulin inhibits eating after its intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration in multiple species and under a variety of conditions. Nevertheless, the results across reports are inconsistent in that ICV insulin does not always reduce food intake. The reasons for this variability are largely unknown. Using mice as a model, we performed several crossover trials with insulin vs. vehicle when infused into the third cerebral ventricle (i3vt) to test the hypothesis that recent experience with the i3vt procedure contributes to the variability in the effect of ICV insulin on food intake. Using a cross-over design with two days between injections, we found that insulin (0.4 μU/mouse) significantly reduced food intake relative to vehicle in mice that received vehicle on the first and insulin on the second trial, whereas this effect was absent in mice that received insulin on the first and vehicle on the second trial. Higher doses (i3vt 4.0 and 40.0 μU/mouse) had no effect on food intake in this paradigm. When injections were spaced 7 days apart, insulin reduced food intake with no crossover effect. Mice that did not reduce food intake in response to higher doses of i3vt insulin did so in response to i3vt infusion of the melanocortin receptor agonist melanotan-II (MT-II), indicating that the function of the hypothalamic melanocortin system, which mediates the effect of insulin on eating, was not impaired by whatever interfered with the insulin effect, and that this interference occurred upstream of the melanocortin receptors. Overall, our findings suggest that associative effects based on previous experience with the experimental situation can compromise the eating inhibition elicited by i3vt administered insulin.
在多种物种及各种条件下,脑室内(ICV)注射胰岛素均会抑制进食。然而,各报告结果并不一致,即ICV胰岛素并非总能减少食物摄入量。这种变异性的原因很大程度上尚不清楚。我们以小鼠为模型,在向第三脑室(i3vt)注入胰岛素与溶剂时进行了多项交叉试验,以检验以下假设:近期的i3vt操作经历导致了ICV胰岛素对食物摄入量影响的变异性。采用交叉设计,两次注射间隔两天,我们发现,在第一次试验接受溶剂、第二次试验接受胰岛素的小鼠中,胰岛素(0.4微单位/小鼠)相对于溶剂显著减少了食物摄入量,而在第一次试验接受胰岛素、第二次试验接受溶剂的小鼠中则未出现这种效果。在此范式中,更高剂量(i3vt 4.0和40.0微单位/小鼠)对食物摄入量无影响。当注射间隔7天时,胰岛素减少了食物摄入量,且无交叉效应。对更高剂量的i3vt胰岛素无食物摄入量减少反应的小鼠,对i3vt注入黑皮质素受体激动剂黑素皮质素-II(MT-II)有反应,这表明介导胰岛素对进食影响的下丘脑黑皮质素系统功能未因干扰胰岛素作用的因素而受损,且这种干扰发生在黑皮质素受体的上游。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,基于先前实验情况经验的关联效应可能会损害i3vt注射胰岛素引起的进食抑制。