Chiou Chiun-Fang, Wang Bruce Cm, Caldwell Ronald, Furnback Wesley, Lee Jung-Sun, Kothandaraman Nathan, Lee SunKyoung, Wang Jin, Zhang Fan
Regional Market Access, Janssen Asia-Pacific, Singapore.
Elysia Group, LLC, Taipei, Taiwan.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Aug 5;11:1989-94. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S86722. eCollection 2015.
Schizophrenia results in substantial health care utilization costs. Much of these costs can be attributed to health care use resulting from nonadherence to treatment, relapse, and hospitalization.
The objective of this research is to further estimate the health care resource utilization costs of patients with schizophrenia in the People's Republic of China, Korea, and Malaysia with a specific focus on the reduction in hospitalization costs associated with the use of long-acting, injectable paliperidone palmitate (PP) relative to alternative treatment medications.
The study focuses exclusively on the estimated reduction in hospitalization days following treatment with PP and the potential associated cost savings. Cost analysis was done using a payer's perspective and only includes direct health care costs associated with hospitalization. Localized cost data were taken from published sources, and health care utilization was estimated based on a clinical study conducted in countries in the Asia-Pacific region. People's Republic of China, Korea, and Malaysia had the highest number of patients enrolled in the clinical study, and thus were chosen for this research. Analysis looked at 12-month and 18-month periods following initial treatment with PP relative to a retrospective 12-month period utilizing alternative treatment medications.
Results suggest that reductions in hospital utilization cost over 12 months may occur through the use of PP relative to alternatives-ranging from $1,991 for the People's Republic of China to $6,698 for Korea and $6,716 for Malaysia.
Given the substantial costs associated with the treatment of schizophrenia both worldwide and in Asia, it is important to fully understand the costs and outcomes associated with various treatment options. In this research, we have specifically analyzed the direct health care cost savings associated with hospital utilization for patients taking PP relative to alternative treatment methods. The results suggest that reductions in hospital utilization cost were associated with PP treatment, likely largely due to increased adherence to treatment.
精神分裂症导致大量医疗保健使用成本。这些成本的很大一部分可归因于因不坚持治疗、复发和住院而产生的医疗保健使用。
本研究的目的是进一步估计中华人民共和国、韩国和马来西亚精神分裂症患者的医疗保健资源使用成本,特别关注与使用长效注射用帕利哌酮棕榈酸酯(PP)相对于替代治疗药物相关的住院成本降低情况。
该研究专门关注PP治疗后住院天数的估计减少以及潜在的相关成本节约。成本分析是从支付方的角度进行的,仅包括与住院相关的直接医疗保健成本。本地化成本数据取自已发表的来源,医疗保健使用情况是根据在亚太地区国家进行的一项临床研究估计的。中华人民共和国、韩国和马来西亚参与临床研究的患者数量最多,因此被选入本研究。分析考察了PP初始治疗后的12个月和18个月期间,并与使用替代治疗药物的回顾性12个月期间进行比较。
结果表明,与替代药物相比,使用PP可能会在12个月内降低医院使用成本,在中国为1991美元,在韩国为6698美元,在马来西亚为6716美元。
鉴于全球和亚洲精神分裂症治疗的巨大成本,充分了解各种治疗方案的成本和结果非常重要。在本研究中,我们专门分析了服用PP的患者相对于替代治疗方法在医院使用方面的直接医疗保健成本节约情况。结果表明,PP治疗与医院使用成本的降低相关,这可能主要归因于治疗依从性的提高。