Reutzel D Ray, Spichtig Alexandra N, Petscher Yaacov
Utah State University.
Capella University.
J Educ Res. 2012;105(6):404-415. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2011.629693.
The authors' purpose was to explore the effects of a supplementary, guided, silent reading intervention with 80 struggling third-grade readers who were retained at grade level as a result of poor performance on the reading portion of a criterion referenced state assessment. The students were distributed in 11 elementary schools in a large, urban school district in the state of Florida. A matched, quasi-experimental design was constructed using propensity scores for this study. Students in the guided, silent reading intervention, , evidenced higher, statistically significant mean scores on the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test criterion assessment measure of reading at posttest. The effect size, favoring the guided, silent reading intervention group was large, 1 full standard deviation, when comparing the 2 comparison groups' mean posttest scores. As such, the results indicate a large advantage for providing struggling third-grade readers guided silent reading fluency practice in a computer-based practice environment. No significant difference was found between the treatment and control group on the Stanford Achievement Test-10 (SAT-10) posttest scores, although posttest scores for the treatment group trended higher than the control. After conducting a power analysis, it was determined that the sample size ( = 80) was too small to provide sufficient statistical power to detect a difference in third-grade students' SAT-10 scores.
作者的目的是探究一项补充性、有指导的默读干预措施对80名三年级阅读困难学生的影响,这些学生因在州标准参照评估的阅读部分表现不佳而留级。这些学生分布在佛罗里达州一个大型城市学区的11所小学。本研究采用倾向得分构建了匹配的准实验设计。接受有指导的默读干预的学生在佛罗里达综合评估测试标准阅读评估指标的后测中,平均得分更高且具有统计学意义。在比较两个对照组的后测平均得分时,有利于有指导的默读干预组的效应量很大,为1个完整标准差。因此,结果表明在基于计算机的练习环境中为三年级阅读困难学生提供有指导的默读流畅性练习具有很大优势。在斯坦福成就测验-10(SAT-10)的后测分数上,治疗组和对照组之间未发现显著差异,尽管治疗组的后测分数比对照组略高。在进行功效分析后,确定样本量(n = 80)太小,无法提供足够的统计功效来检测三年级学生SAT-10分数的差异。