Wanzek Jeanne, Vaughn Sharon, Scammacca Nancy, Gatlin Brandy, Walker Melodee A, Capin Philip
Vanderbilt University.
The University of Texas at Austin.
Educ Psychol Rev. 2016 Sep;28(3):551-576. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
This meta-analysis extends previous work on extensive Tier 3 type reading interventions (Wanzek & Vaughn, 2007; Wanzek et al., 2013) to Tier 2 type interventions by examining a non-overlapping set of studies addressing the effects of less extensive reading interventions for students with or at risk for reading difficulties in Grades K-3. We examined the overall effects of these interventions on students' foundational skills, language, and comprehension as well as the intervention features that may be associated with improved outcomes. We conducted four meta-analyses on 72 studies to examine effects on (1) standardized foundational skill measures (mean ES = 0.54), (2) not-standardized foundational skill measures (mean ES = 0.62), (3) standardized language/comprehension measures (mean ES = 0.36), and (4) not-standardized language/comprehension measures (mean ES = 1.02). There were no differences in effects related to intervention type, instructional group size, grade level, intervention implementer, or the number of intervention hours.
本荟萃分析通过审视一组不重叠的研究,将先前关于广泛的三级阅读干预措施(万泽克和沃恩,2007年;万泽克等人,2013年)的研究扩展至二级干预措施,这些研究探讨了针对幼儿园至三年级有阅读困难或有阅读困难风险的学生开展的不太广泛的阅读干预措施的效果。我们研究了这些干预措施对学生基础技能、语言和阅读理解的总体影响,以及可能与改善结果相关的干预特征。我们对72项研究进行了四项荟萃分析,以研究对以下方面的影响:(1)标准化基础技能测量(平均效应量=0.54),(2)非标准化基础技能测量(平均效应量=0.62),(3)标准化语言/理解测量(平均效应量=0.36),以及(4)非标准化语言/理解测量(平均效应量=1.02)。在与干预类型、教学小组规模、年级、干预实施者或干预时长相关的效果方面没有差异。