Patel Harish, Gaduputi Vinaya, Sakam Sailaja, Kumar Kishore, Chime Chukwunonso, Balar Bhavna
Department of Medicine, Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Aug 27;11:1283-9. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S87044. eCollection 2015.
Serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) are one of the most commonly prescribed classes of medications with a relatively safe side-effect profile. However, SRIs are being increasingly reported to be associated with bleeding complications in patients undergoing invasive procedures resulting from inhibition of serotonin reuptake by platelets and impaired platelet aggregation. The aim of our study was to determine whether there is an increased risk of post-percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) bleeding in patients exposed to SRIs after controlling for other mediations known to increase the risk of bleeding and major comorbidities.
This was a single-center cohort study that included who underwent PEG tube placement by standard pull-guidewire technique from July 2006 to June 2014. Patients were categorized into groups based on the medications (SRIs, aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anticoagulants) administered during the index hospitalization. The incidence of post-PEG bleeding was noted in two distinct post-procedure periods: within 48 hours, and between 48 hours and 14 days.
A total of 637 PEG tube placements were done on 570 patients during the study period. There were 107 patients (18.8%) with major bleeding within 48 hours of PEG and 79 patients (13.9%) with major bleeding between 48 hours and 14 days. There was no significant increase in the post-PEG bleeding in patients taking a combination of an SRI along with aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients on subcutaneous heparin for prophylaxis against thromboembolic events were more likely to have oozing at the PEG site requiring blood transfusion.
We did not notice an increase in post-PEG bleeding in patients on SRIs. However, in view of the limitation that our study is retrospective and that there are no known significant side effects of withdrawal of SRIs for a short duration, withholding SRIs could be a safe clinical option in patients undergoing PEG tube placement.
血清素再摄取抑制剂(SRIs)是最常处方的药物类别之一,其副作用相对安全。然而,越来越多的报告表明,SRIs与接受侵入性手术的患者出血并发症有关,这是由于血小板对血清素再摄取的抑制和血小板聚集受损所致。我们研究的目的是在控制已知会增加出血风险的其他药物和主要合并症后,确定接受SRIs治疗的患者经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)后出血风险是否增加。
这是一项单中心队列研究,纳入了2006年7月至2014年6月期间通过标准牵引导丝技术进行PEG管置入的患者。根据索引住院期间使用的药物(SRIs、阿司匹林、非甾体抗炎药和抗凝剂)将患者分为不同组。在两个不同的术后时期记录PEG后出血的发生率:48小时内,以及48小时至14天之间。
在研究期间,共对570例患者进行了637次PEG管置入。107例患者(18.8%)在PEG后48小时内发生大出血,79例患者(13.9%)在48小时至14天之间发生大出血。同时服用SRI与阿司匹林或非甾体抗炎药的患者,PEG后出血没有显著增加。接受皮下肝素预防血栓栓塞事件的患者更有可能在PEG部位出现渗血,需要输血。
我们没有注意到服用SRIs的患者PEG后出血增加。然而,鉴于我们的研究是回顾性的,且短期内停用SRIs没有已知的重大副作用这一局限性,对于接受PEG管置入的患者,停用SRIs可能是一种安全的临床选择。