Suppr超能文献

新型机器人辅助激光脱毛与医生主导脱毛的疗效比较。

Comparison of Efficacy Between Novel Robot-Assisted Laser Hair Removal and Physician-Directed Hair Removal.

作者信息

Lim Hyoung-Woo, Lee Dong-Hun, Cho Minwoo, Park Sungwoo, Koh Wooseok, Kim Youdan, Chung Jin Ho, Kim Sungwan

机构信息

1 Interdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, College of Engineering, Seoul National University Seoul , Korea.

2 Department of Dermatology, Institute of Human-Environment Interface Biology, Seoul National University College of Medicine , Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Oct;33(10):509-16. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.3948. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the number of laser irradiation sessions, process duration, and hair removal rate required for robot-assisted automatic versus physician-directed laser hair removal.

BACKGROUND DATA

This research group previously developed and tested an automatic laser hair removal (LHR) system to provide uniform laser treatment distribution.

METHODS

Six subjects 20-40 years of age, with skin types III-IV completed this study. A home-use LHR device with an 810 nm diode laser was used to treat equal-sized areas of both upper thighs; a random computer generator determined the use of a robot-assisted automatic LHR system or physician-directed LHR on the right or left thigh. The treatment schedule comprised five visits; subjects were photographed and shaved, and received LHR during the first through the fourth visits at 2-week intervals. The fifth visit occurred 1 month after the fourth, and only involved photography.

RESULTS

All subjects successfully completed the clinical trial with no noticeable or permanent side effects. The average hair removal rates were 49.0% (standard error of the mean [SEM]: 4.0) and 29.5% (SEM: 4.0) for robot-assisted and physician-directed LHR, respectively. The average treatment duration and number of irradiation shots were 18 min, 30 sec (SEM: 33 sec) and 260 (SEM: 5.7) for robot-assisted LHR and 3 min, 11 sec (SEM: 15 sec) and 73 (SEM: 5.9) for physician-directed LHR.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical study successfully demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted LHR. The proposed novel system will benefit both patients and clinicians.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估机器人辅助自动激光脱毛与医生指导激光脱毛所需的照射次数、治疗时长及脱毛率。

背景数据

该研究团队此前研发并测试了一种自动激光脱毛(LHR)系统,以实现激光治疗的均匀分布。

方法

6名年龄在20至40岁之间、皮肤类型为III - IV型的受试者完成了本研究。使用一台配备810纳米二极管激光的家用LHR设备对双侧大腿上部大小相等的区域进行治疗;通过随机计算机生成器决定在右侧或左侧大腿使用机器人辅助自动LHR系统或医生指导的LHR。治疗计划包括五次就诊;在第一次至第四次就诊时,每隔两周对受试者进行拍照、刮毛并接受LHR治疗。第五次就诊在第四次就诊后1个月进行,仅涉及拍照。

结果

所有受试者均成功完成临床试验,未出现明显或永久性副作用。机器人辅助LHR和医生指导LHR的平均脱毛率分别为49.0%(平均标准误差[SEM]:4.0)和29.5%(SEM:4.0)。机器人辅助LHR的平均治疗时长和照射次数分别为18分钟30秒(SEM:33秒)和260次(SEM:5.7),医生指导LHR的平均治疗时长和照射次数分别为3分钟11秒(SEM:15秒)和73次(SEM:5.9)。

结论

本临床研究成功证明了机器人辅助LHR的安全性和有效性。所提出的新型系统将使患者和临床医生均受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验